Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: Spectrogram 5 vs 426 |
| From: | "wireless" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Mon, 26 Jul 1999 06:50:29 +0100 |
| Organization: | T@ylor Training |
| References: | <000901becd8c$0f99b640$e8daac3e@default> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | <[email protected]> |
My own observations showed that a weak signal seemed to show up better on 426 than 5, although I could well have not learned how to drive the latter. However that was version 5.01. I see from the web page for Spectrogram that there is now a v. 5.08. Has anyone tried this? John Taylor G0AKN [email protected] |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: re:136.150 beacon, G0MRF |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: report 25., Koenig, Wolfgang |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: re problems G3XDV and whippy mast extensions?, Steve Rawlings |
| Next by Thread: | LF: re OK1FIG and cluster report, Alan Melia |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |