Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+carrier\s+at\s+8270\.003\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+carrier\s+at\s+8270\.003\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. VLF: carrier at 8270.003 (score: 1): Author: Riccardo Zoli <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 13:04:50 +0200; Hi VLF, A new carrier test is running with about 610mA. Now, with last SL version, the PLL configuration made by Markus seems to works well here, the phase is stable. I started this test yesterday at; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-04/msg00317.html (9,375 bytes)
2. Re: VLF: carrier at 8270.003 (score: 1): Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 11:27:40 +0000; A very nice signal this morning, http://78.46.38.217/fbins3.html#p=1524736800&b=130&s=sp&m=cardioid&w=r&h=62&z1=0.34&z2=0.64&c=1&mb=643,121,724,224,1 Bearing 126.9, great circle is 127.8. -- Paul Nic; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-04/msg00318.html (9,030 bytes)
3. Re: VLF: carrier at 8270.003 (score: 1): Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 17:50:05 +0200; Hi Riccardo, Your signal is well visible here on my grabber http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber2.html Am 26.04.2018 13:04, schrieb Riccardo Zoli: Hi VLF, A new carrier tes; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-04/msg00319.html (11,097 bytes)
4. Re: VLF: carrier at 8270.003 (score: 1): Author: Riccardo Zoli <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 07:45:32 +0000; Hi Riccardo, Your signal is well visible here on my grabber http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber2.html Am 26.04.2018 13:04, schrieb Riccardo Zoli: Hi VLF, A new carrier te; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-04/msg00330.html (12,764 bytes)
5. Re: VLF: carrier at 8270.003 (score: 1): Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 14:46:06 +0200; Hello Riccardo, Looks good. I see you know how to set things up. 73 from JO33UC14 Stefan Am 27.04.2018 09:45, schrieb Riccardo Zoli: Hi VLF, Stefan and Paul, many thanks for reports. Ok, Stefan, grea; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-04/msg00332.html (13,365 bytes)
6. Re: VLF: carrier at 8270.003 (score: 1): Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 15:06:27 +0200; Riccardo, My antenna current plot is at http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/VLF/TX.png It shows the current antenna current antenna current. But also the safe limit and the ALC level. At ni; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-04/msg00333.html (15,586 bytes)
7. Re: VLF: carrier at 8270.003 (score: 1): Author: Riccardo Zoli <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 16:17:12 +0200; Riccardo, My antenna current plot is at http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/VLF/TX.png It shows the current antenna current antenna current. But also the safe limit and the ALC level. At n; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-04/msg00334.html (16,886 bytes)
8. Re: VLF: carrier at 8270.003 (score: 1): Author: Lubomir Bobalik <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2018 11:56:22 +0200; Hello Riccardo! I saw your signal in JN88KS again. Well done, thanks for your activity! Lubos, OK2BVG ** Dne 26.4.2018 v 13:04 Riccardo Zoli napsal(a): Hi VLF, A new carrier test is running with abou; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-04/msg00335.html (9,629 bytes)
9. Re: VLF: carrier at 8270.003 (score: 1): Author: Riccardo Zoli <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 21:29:49 +0000; Lubos, many thanks for your report! I'm testing the coil for long transmissions; I have observed, for my first time, that atmospheric conditions affects antenna current: for example, today it's been; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-04/msg00343.html (11,713 bytes)
10. Re: VLF: carrier at 8270.003 (score: 1): Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 05 May 2018 21:17:07 +0200; Hi Riccardo, Am 29.04.2018 23:29, schrieb Riccardo Zoli: I'm preparing an EbNaut setup for next days: I will announce details soon. When? :-) 73, Stefan; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-05/msg00041.html (8,728 bytes)
11. Re: VLF: carrier at 8270.003 (score: 1): Author: Riccardo Zoli <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 10:12:34 +0200; Hi Stefan, Lubos, Paul, VLF Ok Stefan :-), here we go! I'm starting a series of EbNaut transmissions, from 0800 UTC (9 May) every 8 hours. Then 3 messages per day (0000, 0800, 1600 UTC). QRG: 8270.0; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-05/msg00048.html (11,165 bytes)
12. Re: VLF: carrier at 8270.003 (score: 1): Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 19:35:10 +0000; No decode today at Todmorden, or Bielefeld or Cumiana. Great thunderstorm activity this afternoon in Europe. Based on carrier sent on 26th April the Eb/N0 should have been around 12dB. The 00:00 to 0; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-05/msg00049.html (9,821 bytes)
13. Re: VLF: carrier at 8270.003 (score: 1): Author: Riccardo Zoli <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 21:02:13 +0000; No decode today at Todmorden, or Bielefeld or Cumiana. Great thunderstorm activity this afternoon in Europe. Based on carrier sent on 26th April the Eb/N0 should have been around 12dB. The 00:00 to; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-05/msg00050.html (11,408 bytes)
14. Re: VLF: carrier at 8270.003 (score: 1): Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 23:18:30 +0200; Hi Riccardo, Am 09.05.2018 23:02, schrieb Riccardo Zoli: Thanks, Paul! Sorry but I made a "miscalculation": an exact 8h duration implies a next hour transmission. What does that mean? When exactly di; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-05/msg00051.html (12,169 bytes)
15. Re: VLF: carrier at 8270.003 (score: 1): Author: Riccardo Zoli <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 21:32:53 +0000; Hi Riccardo, Am 09.05.2018 23:02, schrieb Riccardo Zoli: Thanks, Paul! Sorry but I made a "miscalculation": an exact 8h duration implies a next hour transmission. What does that mean? When exactly d; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-05/msg00053.html (12,818 bytes)
16. Re: VLF: carrier at 8270.003 (score: 1): Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 11:14:33 +0000; Two decodes from 00:00 transmission with constant reference phase: Bielefeld 845km: Eb/N0 +2.6 dB, rank 3399, S/N -31.33 dB in 1Hz; Todmorden 1413km: Eb/N0 +1.9 dB, rank 9422, S/N -32.07 dB in 1Hz; C; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-05/msg00056.html (10,890 bytes)
17. Re: VLF: carrier at 8270.003 (score: 1): Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 18:00:01 -0400; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-05/msg00060.html (10,401 bytes)
18. Re: VLF: carrier at 8270.003 (score: 1): Author: Riccardo Zoli <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 11:59:50 +0200; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-05/msg00061.html (11,862 bytes)
19. Re: VLF: carrier at 8270.003 (score: 1): Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 08:38:47 -0400; Hi Riccardo, last night I switched the antenna of the DL0AO instance from the NS earth loop to the E-field probe. This produced a strong decode of your 0 UT transmission. It was also received again h; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-05/msg00062.html (12,605 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 19
Page: [1]