To: | LF Group <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | VLF: carrier at 8270.003 |
From: | Riccardo Zoli <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 26 Apr 2018 13:04:50 +0200 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Vp/CyxUn+4ndHFK1ni4wwpkeqM0Y4h+MIDA0W4ltZ6E=; b=ZNHXAZFBj4hkf5JUjZ0XXHdsiI0GZvS4MBH300BICSJu/d4BgX9efGleWz/d0GpzM+ Vi4dKYv9RemIcjX5uMe7jWXA/VdFcgh4S4mGywAVbrGLqJQ61LIVL42uY9Xfl0DmNvX0 rMSYxi6NGGZavOLTYfexitgrkgCKln4bxhIrRMqPeWUQ3vLtpMgvB5Zgta/3PpselYM+ Wsii7UkklSvudjU/Uex3w7ZFFjCkcPQffTn+/qZS3seiSYfXpNBYOIq2Dzv4CWDMQGZp h1uOr+FuRqnn+X/6zSAQfs0z5xKpbVZKz1ITuSfj3ox4PQwqgSQhCluvAX2BenYiSOvh rDcw== |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi VLF, A new carrier test is running with about 610mA. Now, with last SL version, the PLL configuration made by Markus seems to works well here, the phase is stable. I started this test yesterday at about 10:00 UTC. I'm looking for an adequate conditional statement that permits to inhibit the audio (and the TX) in case of an excess of antenna current drop. Any suggestion? My current VLF condx attached. All the best 73 de Riccardo IW4DXW
20180426_124650.jpg |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: 2,200M WSPR-2, John Bruce McCreath |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: VLF: carrier at 8270.003, Paul Nicholson |
Previous by Thread: | LF: 2,200M WSPR-2, John Bruce McCreath |
Next by Thread: | Re: VLF: carrier at 8270.003, Paul Nicholson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |