Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+TA\,\s+300m\s+and\s+new\s+PA\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: VLF: TA, 300m and new PA? (score: 1)
Author: Dexter McIntyre W4DEX <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:41:20 -0400
What is the ERP of the 11.9 kHz Alpha transmission? I've recently greatly improved my night time reception of the Alpha signals. Your recent post stated a 1 db per 1000 km difference between day and
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00203.html (13,085 bytes)

2. Re: VLF: TA, 300m and new PA? (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:07:08 -0400
And anyway, there is nobody in North America with a suitable rx at the moment! What do you consider suitable? Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00226.html (10,829 bytes)

3. Re: VLF: TA, 300m and new PA? (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:38:47 +0000
I'm inclined to agree. The ERP is low and should only be a problem to a research station near to a tx, which could be dealt with on individual cases. I should think the lightning locator networks wou
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00241.html (13,907 bytes)

4. Re: VLF: TA, 300m and new PA? (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:10:27 +0000
In order to squeeze out the maximum S/N, it looks like a loop antenna is desirable in order to null as much background noise as possible. It must 'see' down to the natural VLF background, so a basic
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00275.html (12,772 bytes)

5. Re: VLF: TA, 300m and new PA? (score: 1)
Author: Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:12:50 +0100 (CET)
For me, the power levels for this long DX are getting worryingly high as they will at some point start to cause interference to research activity. [...] a few years ago i asked people doing geophysi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00560.html (12,342 bytes)

6. VLF: TA, 300m and new PA? (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:11:48 +0100
Paul, LF, So, if we have the approx formula for VLF propagation and know the range of the noise floor at 8,97kHz, then what would be the TX power i have to apply to a 300m vertical to reach Canada/US
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00606.html (14,272 bytes)

7. Re: VLF: TA, 300m and new PA? (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:23:58 +0000
Stefan schrieb: Well, to extrapolate so far from a single data point would be very silly. But silly can be fun, so .... Given B = sqrt( 9.5e-21 * ERP/r) * exp( -r/a) where a = 2.9e6 for daytime path,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00643.html (13,093 bytes)

8. Re: VLF: TA, 300m and new PA? (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:21:17 +0000 (GMT)
Paul, parameter 'a' may be essentually larger if signal propagated over salt water. It depends on deposit of ionosphere and ground to attenuation. Thus nice theoretical problem arises. We can rather
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00650.html (11,795 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu