Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+Resonate\s+the\s+antenna\,\s+or\s+not\?\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. RE: VLF: Resonate the antenna, or not? (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:16:34 +0100
Hello Scott, there is only one way to find out ;-) GL on 33km 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T ________________________________________ Van: [email protected] [[email protected]
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00034.html (19,446 bytes)

2. RE: VLF: Resonate the antenna, or not? (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 10:33:30 +0100
Hello Piotr, Stefan, Scott, based on 6.5mm wire diameter and a skin depth of 0.925mm I come to an effective area of 16.2mm and thus a resistance of 0.174 Ohm for 100m wire (based on a resistivity for
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00176.html (17,160 bytes)

3. Re: VLF: Resonate the antenna, or not? (score: 1)
Author: Scott Tilley <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 22:55:56 -0700
Hi Stefan   The mains has just to supply the losses. So the critical parts are the FETs and the loop wire diameter. I think 100 A rms is a problem for most loops. But i would give it a try. Even the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00208.html (14,643 bytes)

4. Re: VLF: Resonate the antenna, or not? (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 02:13:43 +0100
Hello Markus, VLF, Am 22.03.2011 12:49, schrieb Markus Vester: Jim's small VLF loop example (0.1 + j 2.2 ohms) had a Q of only 22, ie. 1/Q = 4.5% of the energy is lost per cycle. So the total power c
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00298.html (15,828 bytes)

5. VLF: Resonate the antenna, or not? (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 07:49:10 -0400
Hi Stefan, you are raising the interesting question of how important it is to resonate the antenna. I think it boils down to a comparison of the amplifier efficiency versus the Q factor of the matchi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00410.html (19,094 bytes)

6. RE: VLF: Resonate the antenna, or not? (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 20:46:22 +0100
Stefan, have a look here: http://www.seas.gwu.edu/~ecelabs/appnotes/PDF/techdat/CCCofCC.pdf According to this document for a single 2 AWG copper wire in open a current of 170A will cause a temp rise
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00495.html (18,970 bytes)

7. Re: VLF: Resonate the antenna, or not? (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 00:21:24 +0100
Wow, nice! Rik/ON7YD, now its your turn again: What will be the ERP when running 100A in that wire? I think 100A is realistic on such a wire. Skin depth should be 0.9 mm. So the effective conductor a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00592.html (15,855 bytes)

8. Re: VLF: Resonate the antenna, or not? (score: 1)
Author: Piotr Mlynarski <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 03:27:38 +0100
Stefan Schäfer pisze: Wow, nice! Rik/ON7YD, now its your turn again: What will be the ERP when running 100A in that wire? I think 100A is realistic on such a wire. Skin depth should be 0.9 mm. So the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00631.html (15,299 bytes)

9. Re: VLF: Resonate the antenna, or not? (score: 1)
Author: Scott Tilley <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:10:23 -0700
Hi Rik / Piotr Thank you for taking the time to consider this and provide some very useful information. I'm going to tackle this project in stages: 1) Build a smaller h-bridge TX say on the order of
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00646.html (18,234 bytes)

10. Re: VLF: Resonate the antenna, or not? (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:18:25 +0100
Hi Piotr, Rik, Scott, VLF, Tnx for the interesting discussion! Well, 165 uW is quite low for that input power but we have expected that it's even worse than a vertical. But the effort is much lower a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00822.html (17,217 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu