Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+DF6NM\s+on\s+8970\.002\s+\-\s+again\s+tonight\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+DF6NM\s+on\s+8970\.002\s+\-\s+again\s+tonight\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: VLF: DF6NM on 8970.002 - again tonight (score: 1): Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 06:48:03 -0400 (EDT); My transmission on 8970.002 went off air at 6:35 this morning, and the antenna was taken down for the next couple of days because of windy wx. Unfortunately, the LF harmonic showed that again my freq; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-03/msg00140.html (19,163 bytes)
2. Re: VLF: DF6NM on 8970.002 - again tonight (score: 1): Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:11:40 -0400 (EDT); Thanks very much for the interest, and to Chris 'WCD for the excellent capture. As the WX is still dry and calm here, I have put the TX back on at 21 UT for another night, with the same parameters as; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-03/msg00148.html (17,869 bytes)
3. Re: VLF: DF6NM on 8970.002 - again tonight (score: 1): Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 20:05:57 +0200; Hi Markus, Maybe one of those annoying occasions where the soundcard (or its driver) decides to use a "slightly different" sampling rate for the ADC and the DAC, even if both are the same physical de; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-03/msg00480.html (26,526 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]