To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: VLF: DF6NM on 8970.002 - again tonight |
From: | Markus Vester <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:11:40 -0400 (EDT) |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20110426; t=1332972700; bh=nH4WlYCzMx0rnM0EmvecZZXr22LptYVjzzX2Kej5Vk0=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=xG8bBbCgNmDNPtLLvEpwV68SlT9t+fOoEvfv4FzHz8yPOw6EDpwaE1k+x51dPMu9G iPLNp+B4PO3l1qrhFDtXBwxSjp+mPvbueL2PgVnp9/CPwPvt2D87Ms8hrOwvm92IO3 at/cXAAOMSszwp50dny8ukInXOPztNpO5/Z2UUt0= |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Thanks very much for the interest, and to Chris 'WCD for the excellent capture. As the WX is still dry and calm here, I have put the TX back on at 21 UT for another night, with the same parameters as before.
My ERP is a bit uncertain, as I haven't measured the effect of environmental shielding on antenna height at VLF. My best guess is somewhere around 7 to 9 meters, which would give around 90 microohms radiation resistance, or 10 µW EMRP at 0.34 A.
The notion of corona being responsible for the noise was suggested by the threshold-like onset of both visual and acoustical emissions. I currently have only very rudimentary "corona rings", by bending the insulated wire into a couple of little loops at each end. I like Wolf's idea of hanging up garden decoration balls, but I'm not sure whether the landlady would find that an acceptable view ;-) Maybe I should look for clear semi-transparent ones, or even partly evacuate them to let them glow real pretty ;-)
BTW working back from the corona brightness one gets an optical power of about 1 µW in the visual range. Assuming that at this level the partial discharges are consuming on the order of 10% of the TX power, we find that the efficiency of light generation is only some 0.1 ppm - similar to te efficiency of the whole antenna for VLF radiation ;-)
Regarding the noise from the coil, I had originally thought that it might be caused by Lorentz forces in Earth's static field. This gave the idea to cancel the field and thus the noise by permanent magnets mounted appropriately in the coil's vicinity. But this never worked, the magnetic effect turned out to be much too weak to explain the level of 9 kHz noise. Now I think that it is more likely an electrostatic effect from the large AC voltage, combined with static charge buildup on the plastic surfaces. And there is a strong smell of ozone inside of the dustbin after transmitting a while, so there is certainly some degree of partial discharges around the coil buckets.
Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)
-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]> Verschickt: Mi, 28 Mrz 2012 10:27 am Betreff: Re: VLF: DF6NM on 8970.002 Hi Markus,
Nice work! I can see you in 424 uHz, and traces in 4.5 mHz. You leave a strong trace in 47 uHz, at exactly 8970.0020 Hz! Very nice. I can see QSB on your signal in that 174 km distance. What is the ERP? Go on! :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber.html PS: Lubos, really an excellent Grabber!! Am 28.03.2012 09:08, schrieb Chris Dillon: Hi Markus |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: 8.970khz, henny van elst |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: 8.970khz, Markus Vester |
Previous by Thread: | Re: VLF: DF6NM on 8970.002, Stefan Schäfer |
Next by Thread: | LF: RE: DF6NM on 8970.002, Dave G3WCB. |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |