Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+DF6NM\s+on\s+5170\.0025\s+Hz\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+DF6NM\s+on\s+5170\.0025\s+Hz\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. VLF: DF6NM on 5170.0025 Hz (score: 1): Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 06:10:10 -0500; Since 10:43 UT, I'm sending a carrier on 5170.0025 Hz again, feeding 0.2 A to my Marconi antenna in Nuremberg (49.4158N 11.1350E). Best 73, Markus (DF6NM); /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-02/msg00210.html (7,774 bytes)
2. Re: VLF: DF6NM on 5170.0025 Hz (score: 1): Author: DK1IS <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 14:05:03 +0100; Am 10.02.2018 um 12:10 schrieb Markus Vester: Since 10:43 UT, I'm sending a carrier on 5170.0025 Hz again, feeding 0.2 A to my Marconi antenna in Nuremberg (49.4158N 11.1350E). Best 73, Markus (DF6NM; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-02/msg00216.html (9,562 bytes)
3. Re: VLF: DF6NM on 5170.0025 Hz (score: 1): Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 20:52:14 +0000; Thanks, that's going to be useful. I made some alterations last week that might cure the excess H-field noise I have in that band. Your signal will be a good test. Let me know when you close down. --; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-02/msg00232.html (9,395 bytes)
4. Re: VLF: DF6NM on 5170.0025 Hz (score: 1): Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 15:59:28 -0500; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-02/msg00234.html (9,828 bytes)
5. Re: VLF: DF6NM on 5170.0025 Hz (score: 1): Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 21:23:49 +0000; No problem, 2 hours should be fine. I'll dig the signal out of the recording tomorrow. Thanks a lot for the signal! -- Paul Nicholson --; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-02/msg00235.html (9,609 bytes)
6. Re: VLF: DF6NM on 5170.0025 Hz (score: 1): Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 14:13:47 +0100; Am 10.02.2018 21:52, schrieb Paul Nicholson: I made some alterations last week that might cure the excess H-field noise I have in that band. Did you further improve the system? Tomorrow i intend to r; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-02/msg00254.html (10,538 bytes)
7. Re: VLF: DF6NM on 5170.0025 Hz (score: 1): Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 18:05:08 +0000; The signal from Markus yesterday measures E-field 8nV/m and S/N 11.24 dB in 139 uHz. H-field 0.025 fT but S/N only 3.1 dB. Obviously the excess noise on H at this frequency is still there. Based on t; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-02/msg00257.html (11,672 bytes)
8. Re: VLF: DF6NM on 5170.0025 Hz (score: 1): Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 14:20:23 +0100; Am 11.02.2018 19:05, schrieb Paul Nicholson: The signal from Markus yesterday measures E-field 8nV/m and S/N 11.24 dB in 139 uHz. H-field 0.025 fT but S/N only 3.1 dB. Obviously the excess noise on H; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-02/msg00267.html (13,649 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]