Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+8270\.000\s+Hz\s+and\s+forest\s+VLF\s+grabber\s+preparations\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VLF\:\s+8270\.000\s+Hz\s+and\s+forest\s+VLF\s+grabber\s+preparations\.\.\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: VLF: 8270.000 Hz and forest VLF grabber preparations... (score: 1): Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 22:03:19 +0100; Hi Uwe, Thanks for the test. I will try... But the QRN is much higher now. Maybe it is helpful to repeat the test tomorrow starting 9 UT? If you can and like... More news: I managed to run 2 soundcar; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-02/msg00230.html (12,530 bytes)
2. Re: VLF: 8270.000 Hz and forest VLF grabber preparations... (score: 1): Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 23:25:31 +0100; Hi Uwe, OK, i run various time offsets but there is no clear decode. Some decodes appeared but with 2 characters it could be wrong. I've got one decode with the message "GT". Is that right? (Another; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-02/msg00253.html (13,416 bytes)
3. Re: VLF: 8270.000 Hz and forest VLF grabber preparations... (score: 1): Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 15:13:25 +0100; Hi Paul, Uwe, VLF, Am 17.02.2016 10:50, schrieb Paul Nicholson: For now, stay with 16 bit CRC and use list length 1000 or less for 2 chars. -- Paul Nicholson -- RR. I set the list length to 1000 but; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-02/msg00288.html (12,494 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]