Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ULF\:\s+5\s+wavelengths\s+on\s+the\s+101\s+km\s+band\?\s+Valid\s+or\s+not\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. ULF: 5 wavelengths on the 101 km band? Valid or not? (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 14:49:14 +0100
Hi all, Meanwhile my 1 week taking transmission, starting  01.FEB.2017 23:30 UTC on 2970.000000 Hz at 150...170 mA is completed. I tried to leave a trace/peak into a range beyong 3 wavelengths. Renat
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-02/msg00095.html (12,426 bytes)

2. Re: ULF: 5 wavelengths on the 101 km band? Valid or not? (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 14:52:38 +0100
Attachment... Am 11.02.2017 14:49, schrieb DK7FC: Hi all, Meanwhile my 1 week taking transmission, starting  01.FEB.2017 23:30 UTC on 2970.000000 Hz at 150...170 mA is completed. I tried to leave a t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-02/msg00096.html (13,028 bytes)

3. Re: ULF: 5 wavelengths on the 101 km band? Valid or not? (score: 1)
Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 14:22:29 +0000
Hi Stefan I am convinced, but do it again. On UK TV many years ago there was an advertisement  for car tyres, they didn't use an actor but an ex chief of police to say "I am convinced that this is a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-02/msg00097.html (13,541 bytes)

4. Re: ULF: 5 wavelengths on the 101 km band? Valid or not? (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 15:50:01 +0100
Good for emissions too Ed Smile emoticon Smile emoticon wet road = no smoke G,) [notice there is no abs, wheel is locked , so any nonsense about water clearing is not relevant, as the wheel is not tu
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-02/msg00098.html (15,472 bytes)

5. Re: ULF: 5 wavelengths on the 101 km band? Valid or not? (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 15:55:32 +0000
I scraped the pixels off the Cumiana spectrogram, (summing each row) and did my best guess of reversing the mapping of power to pixel brightness. http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/170211a.png 2970 is the st
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-02/msg00100.html (10,530 bytes)

6. RE: ULF: 5 wavelengths on the 101 km band? Valid or not? (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 12:58:42 -0500
Congratulations and compliments Stefan, Paul and Renato, Markus and Wolf for enabling and providing what so far seems to be the only published experimental data for this poorly-understood part of the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-02/msg00102.html (11,356 bytes)

7. RE: ULF: 5 wavelengths on the 101 km band? Valid or not? (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 13:09:54 -0500
Paul, I'm guessing that your 3 sigma to 4 sigma estimate is based on a comparison of the 2970Hz pixels' amplitudes to surrounding pixels' amplitudes during the time that Stefan was transmitting; is t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-02/msg00103.html (12,396 bytes)

8. Re: ULF: 5 wavelengths on the 101 km band? Valid or not? (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 23:28:13 +0100
Hi Markus, Paul, Eddie, Marco, Jim, Renato, thanks for the positive feedback. Am 11.02.2017 15:22, schrieb g3zjo: I am convinced, but do it again. Yes, i will do it again on another frequency. Hopefu
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-02/msg00107.html (10,499 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu