Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+its\s+back\s+\-\s+maybe\s+\-\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: its back - maybe - (score: 1)
Author: Dave Pick <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 07:14:54 -0700 (PDT)
Andy Yes, some very interesting callsigns coming up! Super DX... some of them appear to be in the middle of the Pacific ocean! What causes that? Dave. From: Andy Talbot <[email protected]> To
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-09/msg00075.html (13,825 bytes)

2. Re: LF: its back - maybe - (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 14:45:07 +0100
Several decodes of the QRP transmission at G3YXM, all at the -25 to -27dB S/N level, so right on the threshold.   Dave, you're getting quite a number of false decodes accordng to the WSPR database. 
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-09/msg00111.html (12,750 bytes)

3. Re: LF: its back - maybe - (score: 1)
Author: Dave Pick <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:47:08 +0000 (GMT)
Andy I've put my WSPR back on on 137.5 but as I was setting it up I heard a "G8IMR" CW ID so I'll be surprised if I don't get a copy! Dave By the way, I had a similar shed conflagration a few years b
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-09/msg00482.html (11,396 bytes)

4. Re: LF: its back - maybe - (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:29:33 +0100
rgr..   Well, as you seem to be copying me running 600W at -4dB S/N, that suggests if I swap to the QRP amp runnng around 6 - 8 watts copy will be right on the edge and more interesting   I seem to h
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-09/msg00505.html (13,051 bytes)

5. Re: LF: its back - maybe - (score: 1)
Author: "Johan H. Bodin" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 14:02:02 +0200
Conflagration was a totally new word for me. I had to look it up... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflagration 73 Johan SM6LKM --
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-09/msg00646.html (9,515 bytes)

6. RE: LF: its back - maybe - (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 16:40:27 +0200
Dave, Andy, from my own experience I have the impression that false decodes often occur in the absense of real decodes. Last week I had WSPR runnig several nights on 137kHz (attempting to catch G3XBM
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-09/msg00662.html (15,268 bytes)

7. LF: its back - maybe - (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:10:10 +0100
Hope I'm not typing this too soon, but monitor 137.53kHz (USB dial 136kHz) WSPR. 600 Watts again   A bucket of water is lying close by this time.   The coil is now in a brand new plastic dustbin with
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-09/msg00730.html (10,035 bytes)

8. Re: LF: its back - maybe - (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 15:39:06 +0100
Usually impulsive interference, carriers  and the laws of probability.   Given a data stream with strong source coding and all original redundancy removed, then any data that passes the error correct
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-09/msg00735.html (16,304 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu