To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: its back - maybe - |
From: | Andy Talbot <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:29:33 +0100 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=PZ4KeLMekJ4aguNEvHtMbLL9unG4c3tzAwiMY2E2W7s=; b=gRODCaXRIxMhZRFjdapcUYXoH6IeWXBev0Esx0DN1NcHqjpT/H0QKnpG4Fk9pUyVR1 yStCVuSkJmShNj0WkbphHS95vgPA197Vz7IP2/753kQmA9dMMrd/mlKPXQVH2WA4qIVJ NxeXu+v2NJ9DyDf0mVE4dPUvQAL6v3z4w/0g0= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=RTPkNDyea28d6YaHqlLOysJ3zAqBkZn2h8YH0wVwHBjIFGQOkSzbP6pAQgtV7NXznM QoAxfk0a2yM+Std7Ys29S9pyMGs+WSmQgcu9mYAApq3w9t9vfTOoTJm+rP2YPGaxitBf vw9U+ox2Cw9B3nujrURBykAKuXYgGrNDq4WsI= |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
rgr..
Well, as you seem to be copying me running 600W at -4dB S/N, that suggests if I swap to the QRP amp runnng around 6 - 8 watts copy will be right on the edge and more interesting
I seem to have demonstrated the new (almost original style) coil housing is going to survive this time, and there's no way I want to leave it running unattended while I go out, so will be changing over to QRP shortly...
And the message contents won't change - so it is still lying. ERP ~ -3dBm now
On 21 September 2010 11:47, Dave Pick <[email protected]> wrote:
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: XNS 21-09.jpg, jrusgrove |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: its back - maybe -, Johan H. Bodin |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: its back - maybe -, Dave Pick |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: its back - maybe -, Johan H. Bodin |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |