Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+defence\s+of\s+WSPR\s+Signals\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+defence\s+of\s+WSPR\s+Signals\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. LF: defence of WSPR Signals (score: 1): Author: Peter Cleall <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:17:33 +0000 (GMT); I have always been interested in propagation. These WSPR signals are seen by some as repetitious rubbish. If you use , WSPR, the Internet database and your own receptions you soon realise that there; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00222.html (11,177 bytes)
2. Re: LF: defence of WSPR Signals (score: 1): Author: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:44:55 +0200; I have always been interested in propagation. These WSPR signals are seen by some as repetitious rubbish. Not by some... by just one... the group troll... 73 Alberto I2PHD; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00271.html (9,402 bytes)
3. Re: LF: defence of WSPR Signals (score: 1): Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:15:24 +0100; More than you think. CANNOT SAY YOU ARE AN EXPERT!!!!!!!!!!!! Where is your SIGNAL ? on LF/MF I have always been interested in propagation. These WSPR signals are seen by some as repetitious rubbish.; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00774.html (10,022 bytes)
4. Re: LF: defence of WSPR Signals (score: 1): Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:06:58 +0100; Having been away on holiday for a couple of weeks without internet connection I missed this thread until today. My views on WSPR are simple. It is (will be) enormously helpful when analysing LF anten; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-10/msg00404.html (10,543 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]