Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+bounce\s+test\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+bounce\s+test\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. LF: bounce test (score: 1): Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 13:32:56 +0100; Just to get an example of the bounce.io response. Please note these responses do not suggest your message has not been accepted, they show that one members address, now obselete, cannot be delivered; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-11/msg00167.html (8,937 bytes)
2. Re: LF: bounce test (score: 1): Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 12:40:49 +0000 (UTC); Tnx fer info but bounce backs are the norm now with black-sheep.... :-( 73 es GL Pete M0FMT GQRP#15097.in IO91UX Subject: LF: bounce test To: [email protected] Date: Sunday, 20 November, 2; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-11/msg00168.html (9,466 bytes)
3. Re: LF: bounce test (score: 1): Author: "Chris" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 14:00:29 +0100; Is this something new? I have always, for years, got a copy of my own messages back. Chris, G4AYT. -- Original Message -- From: "M0FMT" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Su; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-11/msg00169.html (10,072 bytes)
4. Re: LF: bounce test (score: 1): Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 14:26:17 +0100; Hi Chris ....yes you should I do....mostly though some end up in my ISP mail spam folder. However some ISPs regard all mails from self to self as spam . If you post to the group you will usually get; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-11/msg00170.html (11,908 bytes)
5. Re: LF: bounce test (score: 1): Author: "Chris" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 14:48:18 +0100; Thanks Alan. Chris, G4AYT. -- Original Message -- From: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2016 1:22 PM Subject: Re: LF: bounce tes; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-11/msg00171.html (12,504 bytes)
6. Re: LF: bounce test (score: 1): Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 14:55:15 +0000 (UTC); Subject: Re: LF: bounce test To: [email protected] Date: Sunday, 20 November, 2016, 12:40 Tnx fer info but bounce backs are the norm now with black-sheep.... :-( 73 es GL Pete M0FMT GQRP#1; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-11/msg00172.html (9,750 bytes)
7. Re: LF: bounce test (score: 1): Author: Lawrence Galea <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 17:34:32 +0100; OK Alan Thanks; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-11/msg00173.html (13,098 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]