Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: bounce test

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: bounce test
From: "Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 12:57:02 -0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1479646623; bh=apTk0iTIydn8inD1w+ds7TV+nxtzcqizPG82yMTBgt8=; h=Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:X-Mailer; b=H3/z5v1VlFhXs1YiTDYidkCfysCDrzgnLNScw84E7aKaDZX7xYJgvXM3Kq0Xo/cjSNpH2bGjRAN7ijh+bRTFcGEk4LAcZ/bbw5Pes+9npVaX3K/sN4LC8HiQ3pQqzoK/7QNdBuJmj9F0BG3SjQPrNwkYd5FvXvkoHT0gtrwKRGw=
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Is this something new? I have always, for years, got a copy of my own messages back.
Chris, G4AYT.
----- Original Message ----- From: "M0FMT" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2016 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: LF: bounce test


Tnx fer info but bounce backs are the norm now with black-sheep.... :-(

73 es GL Pete M0FMT GQRP#15097.in IO91UX

On Sun, 20/11/16, Alan Melia <[email protected]> wrote:

Subject: LF: bounce test
To: [email protected]
Date: Sunday, 20 November, 2016, 12:28

Just to get an example of the
bounce.io response.

Please note these responses do not suggest your message has
not been
accepted, they show that one members address, now obselete,
cannot be
delivered to. They are only sent to the originator but are a
pain. The owner
of bounce.io has been advised he does not have authority to
intercept these
emails and has been requested to desist.....with no reply of
course.

Alan
G3NYK






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>