Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: bounce test |
| From: | "Chris" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sun, 20 Nov 2016 12:57:02 -0000 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1479646623; bh=apTk0iTIydn8inD1w+ds7TV+nxtzcqizPG82yMTBgt8=; h=Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:X-Mailer; b=H3/z5v1VlFhXs1YiTDYidkCfysCDrzgnLNScw84E7aKaDZX7xYJgvXM3Kq0Xo/cjSNpH2bGjRAN7ijh+bRTFcGEk4LAcZ/bbw5Pes+9npVaX3K/sN4LC8HiQ3pQqzoK/7QNdBuJmj9F0BG3SjQPrNwkYd5FvXvkoHT0gtrwKRGw= |
| References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
Is this something new? I have always, for years, got a copy of my own
messages back.
Chris, G4AYT.----- Original Message ----- From: "M0FMT" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2016 12:40 PM Subject: Re: LF: bounce test Tnx fer info but bounce backs are the norm now with black-sheep.... :-( 73 es GL Pete M0FMT GQRP#15097.in IO91UX On Sun, 20/11/16, Alan Melia <[email protected]> wrote: Subject: LF: bounce test To: [email protected] Date: Sunday, 20 November, 2016, 12:28 Just to get an example of the bounce.io response. Please note these responses do not suggest your message has not been accepted, they show that one members address, now obselete, cannot be delivered to. They are only sent to the originator but are a pain. The owner of bounce.io has been advised he does not have authority to intercept these emails and has been requested to desist.....with no reply of course. Alan G3NYK |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: bounce test, M0FMT |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: bounce test, Alan Melia |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: bounce test, M0FMT |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: bounce test, Alan Melia |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |