Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+VO1NA\s+TX\s+The\s+real\s+explaination\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+VO1NA\s+TX\s+The\s+real\s+explaination\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: VO1NA TX The real explaination (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 18:34:44 EDT; Yes, one must be careful when dealing with those guys. Proving that your time device's registration is current in whatever epoch you may find yourself is not always a simple task. And if you have one; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-07/msg00156.html (8,440 bytes)
2. Re: LF: VO1NA TX The real explaination (score: 1): Author: "Walter Blanchard" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 18:05:33 +0100; You ought to be careful publicising that, Joe, somebody will patent it and start selling 100% efficient LF antennas based on your theory. After all, it's been done before! Walter G3JKV. -- Checked by; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-07/msg00158.html (9,929 bytes)
3. Re: LF: VO1NA TX The real explaination (score: 1): Author: "Joe Craig" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 13:10:44 -0230 (NDT); Lots of good guesses, but the real answer is that at 00:59:60 tomorrow morning I'll be radiating imaginary 2200m photons using the jX component of the antenna impedance instead or the customary R com; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-07/msg00162.html (11,741 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]