Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Tune\s+and\s+match\s+the\s+ant\s+for\s+50kHz\.\.\.550kHz\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Tune and match the ant for 50kHz...550kHz (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: 02 Apr 2009 18:02 GMT
Dear Petr, at the input of my VLF-LF converter I have just a simple low pass filter with a cut-off frequency of about 80 kHz. This is sufficient even for a low-power mixer IC like an NE602 or similar
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-04/msg00084.html (17,504 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Tune and match the ant for 50kHz...550kHz (score: 1)
Author: Petr Malư <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:28:52 +0200
Hello all, Thanks all for your comments, it helps. I can't recall that anybody would ever mention the possibility to change serial connection of the coils of a variometer to the parallel one. If the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-04/msg00118.html (15,937 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Tune and match the ant for 50kHz...550kHz (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 09:49:13 +0200
Hello Petr, 50-550kHz seems a "big shot". If you want to tune (bring to resonance) the antenna using a variometer it would need a ratio of (550/50)^2 = 121. The variometer I use on 500kHz has a range
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-04/msg00218.html (11,776 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Tune and match the ant for 50kHz...550kHz (score: 1)
Author: Petr Malư <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 15:15:34 +0200
Hello Ha-Jo Thanks for your suggestion. My transmatch woud be used mainly for RX, however, I still believe that a tuned antenna is better than detuned one. At least it is a good preselection for RX.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-04/msg00242.html (15,982 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Tune and match the ant for 50kHz...550kHz (score: 1)
Author: "dave.riley3" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:31:30 -0400
You can use a simple vertical LOOP made from one piece of HEAVY, well insulated wire and one vacuum variable capacitor... Advantages: No need of many wires dug into the ground to lose power No hoisti
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-04/msg00274.html (12,812 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Tune and match the ant for 50kHz...550kHz (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 17:30:25 +0200
Petr, you can use a Pi filter, but I am afraid that the values might become rather inconvenient: A short (relative to the wavelength) wire antenna will act as a R-C series circuit where C is the ante
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-04/msg00283.html (16,204 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Tune and match the ant for 50kHz...550kHz (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 14:49:20 +0200
And, by the way, the "sphere in sphere" variometer has a big drawback: Its Q is quite OK at maximum inductivity but very poor at its minumum. Explanation is simple. Just assuming the resistance of th
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-04/msg00368.html (13,235 bytes)

8. LF: Tune and match the ant for 50kHz...550kHz (score: 1)
Author: Petr Malư <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 09:26:22 +0200
Hi all, I want to make a small transmatch (RX, TX up to 10 Watts, or so) to tune LW 41 m (or smaller T-ant) in the range 50 ... 550 kHz. I am not too good in theory... but I believe that the most eff
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-04/msg00409.html (10,511 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Tune and match the ant for 50kHz...550kHz (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: 02 Apr 2009 11:15 GMT
Dear Petr, I guess the easiest solution would be to seperate receiving and transmitting. For receive it is not necessary at all to tune the antenna. I am using my LF T-antenna for receive from 10 kHz
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-04/msg00422.html (13,417 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu