Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+TA\s+CW\s+QSO\s+on\s+MF\s+band\s+is\s+not\s+a\s+scoop\s+\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+TA\s+CW\s+QSO\s+on\s+MF\s+band\s+is\s+not\s+a\s+scoop\s+\!\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. LF: TA CW QSO on MF band is not a scoop ! (score: 1): Author: André Guyé <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 16:01:04 +0200; Hi to all. Sure, it is not necessary to plan QRO for CW coming from Joe. Here I heard often the signal coming from Joe last winter, and also just some last days around 0200 TU on QRSS with 559 good s; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-05/msg00045.html (12,331 bytes)
2. RE: LF: TA CW QSO on MF band is not a scoop ! (score: 1): Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 08:13:06 +0000; J'entend Joe aussi, mais il est très faible... Hi Christian, it's due to the time of the year. From november til february it should be no problem to work Joe in CW with moderate power (< 1W EIRP). Du; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-05/msg00062.html (28,681 bytes)
3. Re: LF: TA CW QSO on MF band is not a scoop ! (score: 1): Author: "C. Groeger" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 18:09:18 +0200; André, Peut-être tu m'as pas bien compris. Pourquoi faire du qrss si l'on pourrait faire CW? J'entend Joe aussi, mais il est très faible... 73, Df5qg Christian Groeger; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-05/msg00161.html (12,693 bytes)
4. Re: LF: TA CW QSO on MF band is not a scoop ! (score: 1): Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 20:41:01 +0200; Especially when we consider that 1 W ERP is the legal limit in most parts of EU... 73, Wolf . Am 06.05.2014 16:01, schrieb André Guyé: Hi to all. Sure, it is not necessary to plan QRO for CW coming f; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-05/msg00162.html (13,012 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]