Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Sub\s+9kHz\s+antenna\s+tests\.\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Sub 9kHz antenna tests. (score: 1)
Author: Gary - G4WGT <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 20:05:44 +0000
Hi Gary Yes I see Jim 'tunes' his loop after the coax feed or is it HF filtering. My Loop is 800mm sq 50 turns and 3.6mH according to rjeloop. I am using SpecLab and PC 73 Eddie . On 05/03/2011 18:5
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00008.html (19,685 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Sub 9kHz antenna tests. (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 16:48:30 +0000
Hi Gary Thanks for the reply, first thing, for "10dB hump at 8.9kHz" read 20dB. Direct coupling of coax to the feed was killing the Q, I have added a 4 turn coupling loop. The flatness was only reall
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00204.html (13,484 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Sub 9kHz antenna tests. (score: 1)
Author: Gary - G4WGT <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 15:21:55 +0000
Hi Eddie, Yes, you will need a pre-amp, don' forget that the E-Probe has a pre-amp. I advise you to build the M0BMU VLF pre-amp with 7 to 10 kHz band-pass filter, circuit attached. 73, Gary - G4WGT.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00297.html (12,632 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Sub 9kHz antenna tests. (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 19:40:45 +0000
Hi Gary Yes I see Jim 'tunes' his loop after the coax feed or is it HF filtering. My Loop is 800mm sq 50 turns and 3.6mH according to rjeloop. I am using SpecLab and PC 73 Eddie . On 05/03/2011 18:52
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00309.html (18,130 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Sub 9kHz antenna tests. (score: 1)
Author: Gary - G4WGT <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 18:52:39 +0000
Hi Gary Thanks for the reply, first thing, for "10dB hump at 8.9kHz" read 20dB. Direct coupling of coax to the feed was killing the Q, I have added a 4 turn coupling loop. The flatness was only real
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00330.html (16,347 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Sub 9kHz antenna tests. (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 23:59:31 +0000
Hi Jim Thanks for that, I knew we could depend on an analysis from you. You confirm my thoughts and findings, I went for a step tuned, low loss loop, I get 20dB gain around >1kHz wide on tuning to 9k
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00333.html (15,190 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Sub 9kHz antenna tests. (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 23:48:42 +0100
Dear Eddie, Gary, LF Group, The loop is tuned, but is very low Q, and has more of a low-pass response really. It was done this way partly in order to obtain a wide bandwidth around 9kHz, which allows
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00424.html (14,857 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Sub 9kHz antenna tests. (score: 1)
Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 14:22:21 +0000
Hi Gary I am testing a very similar loop to your 1.1m square, mine is 800mm sq. and uses Litz wire. Results at the same hight as my E-Probe are disappointing as yet. I have no pre amp on it, and am w
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00543.html (10,770 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Sub 9kHz antenna tests. (score: 1)
Author: Gary - G4WGT <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 13:13:47 +0000
You can get much higher signal voltage out of the same loop antenna by changing it to a high Q resonant design. I guess with the relatively high impedance load of the sound card input (several kohm)
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00666.html (15,369 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu