​​Dear all, I finally found the time to implement JT9-5 and just uploaded v0.9.12.5. Be ware that this is a ZIP file that only contains the SlowJT9.exe. In order to use it you need to ins
I tried to find some method to run a JT9-2 vs JT9-5 comparison test but I did not succeed. To do so requires running two instances of SlowJT9 to receive. Two can run from the same installation folder
UPDATE: (Thanks Rik and also Geoff, G0LUJ) I now have two copies of SlowJT9 running and saving decodes. TRY THIS AT YOUR OWN RISK! It works fine for me. Assuming you have a working copy of 0.9.12.5 a
Hello Rik, LF, Congrats to the latest version! I'm going to install it now and hope it will work well here too. What about the JT9-10 mode? It could be very helpful on 2200m these days. My VLF TX was
LF, I am now TXing JT9-5 on 137.38 kHz. Is there someone who yould give me a report? It is good to see that the program did not crash yet on my PC. This is an improvement. Even the transmisions seem
Hello Stefan, I switched to 136.8kHz dial: 1215 -9 -0.6 580 5 CQ DK7FC JN49 1225 -4 -0.4 580 5 CQ DK7FC JN49 About the audio frequency limit for JT9-5: this is injherent on the decoding technique I a
Hello Rik, Thank you for your efforts in slowJT9. The latest improvements seem to be the breakthrough. Very well. Am 28.12.2018 14:35, schrieb Rik Strobbe: Hello Stefan, I switched to 136.8kHz dial:
Hello Rik, I will change my frequency to go below 640 Hz for the next tests of JT9-5. In anticipation that JT9-10 may have a similar reduction in sensitivity at the high end, and to give us a bit mor
Hello Paul, all, about the JT9 decoder sensitivity: so far it is only an impression that it degrades at higher frequencies. I will have to do some more testing to confirm or deny it. But I won't hurt
Rik, is WSPR-15 mode something that can be incorporated into your software? By the way, I listened to Paul last night on JT9-5 and JT9-2. His JT9-5 signal was decoded well before I started to decode
Hello Jay, as far as I know WSPR has no separate decoding EXE, so that migh be a problem. But my next target is JT9-10, that might come close to WSPR-15 in regard with SNR. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T Rik,
Hello Paul, all, I will again monitor 136kHz dial (400-840Hz audio) overnight in JT9-2 and JT9-5 mode (probably 23UTC .. 07 UTC). I will report any copies in the morning. Maybe others will join? I wo
Hello Rik, I believe WSPR does have a separate decoding EXE. Moving the decoding EXE from WSJT-X 2.0 to WSPR-X is one of the modifications which has been used recently by several people. I *think* it
Running JT9-5 136.000....650 hz now and rest of evening. If you are able to call please do so. 73, Wayde K3MF --Original Message-- From: N1BUG <[email protected]> To: rsgb-lf-group <rsgb-lf-group@groups
...just wanted to lokk what i've decoded last night but i just found the message in the attachment :-( Last lines from the debug log: 18-12-28 21:09:55:383 : Idle (63ms) 18-12-28 21:09:55:383 : 18-12
Hello Markus, Stefan, it seems to be a VAC related problem. I am not using VAC, but I could install it anyway and see if I can reproduce the error. But, as Markus says, with some perseverance it shou
Hmm "Audio level bar updated" - maybe VAC / VBcable were initially delivering digital zeroes, crashing the logarithm in the dB conversion? 73, Markus --Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-- Von: Rik Strobbe <ri
