Re: LF: SlowJT9 update (v0.9.12.5)

[N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>]

Hello Rik,

I believe WSPR does have a separate decoding EXE. Moving the
decoding EXE from WSJT-X 2.0 to WSPR-X is one of the modifications
which has been used recently by several people. I *think* it is
WSPRD.EXE...

WSPR-15 is a fantastic beacon mode but even after the recent
suggested decoder move and some replacement of DLLs it will not run
stable for some of us. It may run for an hour, sometimes a day,
then crash crash crash. Yesterday I started it 20 times in 30
minutes, then gave up.

If it would be possible to have WSPR-15 in a stable software
package, it might get more use.

73,
Paul N1BUG


On 12/28/18 1:40 PM, Rik Strobbe wrote:
> Hello Jay,
> 
> as far as I know WSPR has no separate decoding EXE, so that migh
> be a problem. But my next target is JT9-10, that might come close
> to WSPR-15 in regard with SNR.
> 
> 73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T
> 
> ________________________________________ Van:
> owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org> namens Jay Hainline
> <ka9cfd@mtcnow.net> Verzonden: vrijdag 28 december 2018 15:50 
> Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Onderwerp: RE: LF: SlowJT9
> update (v0.9.12.5)
> 
> Rik, is WSPR-15 mode something that can be incorporated into your
> software?
> 
> By the way, I listened to Paul last night on JT9-5 and JT9-2. His
> JT9-5 signal was decoded well before I started to decode him on
> JT9-2. However there was a lot of JT9-5 sequences I could not get
> a decode on even though the trace was easily seen in the
> waterfall. I was having a LOT of lightning static from storms
> down in the Southern USA and that seemed to be playing a big role
> in what I could decode.
> 
> 73 Jay KA9CFD