Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+SAQ\s+this\s+afternoon\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+SAQ\s+this\s+afternoon\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: SAQ this afternoon? (score: 1): Author: pws <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 19:09:36 +0100; Hi Horst, Confirming some weak traces at 17.2 kHz, 2010-11-05, 09:00-10:00 and 13:25-15:00 utc. Unfortunately SAQ is near the "Nulls" of the antennas used here. Gruesse aus Kiel, Peter; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-11/msg00106.html (9,256 bytes)
2. Re: LF: SAQ this afternoon? (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 23:46:53 +0100; Here also confirmed! And at about 13:20 UTC there must have been such a flair again? Signals came up again, suddenly! And... between 10 UTC and 20 UTC, the QRN rised > 15 dB. 73, Stefan Am 05.11.2010; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-11/msg00148.html (10,072 bytes)
3. LF: SAQ this afternoon? (score: 1): Author: "Horst Stöcker" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 18:29:38 +0100 (CET); Hello, I was very surprised to see and hear a signal on the SAQ frequency this afternoon. I think it really has been SAQ. You see a typical drift at the beginning of the carrier. Possibly they were s; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-11/msg00191.html (9,205 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]