Re: LF: SAQ this afternoon?

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: SAQ this afternoon?
From:	pws <[email protected]>
Date:	Fri, 05 Nov 2010 19:09:36 +0100
In-reply-to:	<1122369242.4418634.1288978178365.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb078>
References:	<[email protected]> <1122369242.4418634.1288978178365.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb078>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.9.1.14) Gecko/20101013 SUSE/3.0.9 Thunderbird/3.0.9

Hi Horst,

You wrote:

> ...
> I was very surprised to see and hear a signal on the SAQ frequency this 
> afternoon.
> 
> I think it really has been SAQ. You see a typical drift at the beginning of 
> the carrier. Possibly they were servicing the transmitter. The signal was not 
> as strong as while the official transmissions.
> ...

Confirming some weak traces at 17.2 kHz, 2010-11-05, 09:00-10:00 and
13:25-15:00 utc. Unfortunately SAQ is near the "Nulls" of the antennas used
here.

Gruesse aus Kiel,
Peter

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: TEST F5WK 25dB over wideband noise on 137, John RABSON LF: SAQ this afternoon?, Horst_St=C3=B6cker Re: LF: SAQ this afternoon?, pws <= Re: LF: SAQ this afternoon?, Stefan Schäfer LF: Captures SAQ this afternoon?, Horst_St=C3=B6cker

Previous by Date:	RE: IMO SYNOPTIC was Re: LF: The Wideband Noise, Terry GW0EZY
Next by Date:	RE: IMO SYNOPTIC was Re: LF: The Wideband Noise, Rik Strobbe
Previous by Thread:	LF: SAQ this afternoon?, Horst_St=C3=B6cker
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: SAQ this afternoon?, Stefan Schäfer
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]