Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+SAQ\s+reception\s+in\s+CT\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+SAQ\s+reception\s+in\s+CT\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: SAQ reception in CT (score: 1): Author: <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 09:48:29 -0400; Stefan Noise appeared to be lower by about 3 dB during the second session ... and there always seems to be a couple dB QSB on SAQs signal strength over 5 - 10's of minutes. When the combination works; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-07/msg00256.html (10,022 bytes)
2. LF: SAQ reception in CT (score: 1): Author: <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 09:00:56 -0400; Reception of July 1, 2012 1200 UTC session was better than the 0900 UTC although not as good as 'all time' best reception of SAQ during the 2nd session of the July 2011 event. MP3 from this morning's; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-07/msg00404.html (8,285 bytes)
3. Re: LF: SAQ reception in CT (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2012 15:06:34 +0200; Hi Jay, Interesting. Were the signal levels higher in the afternoon? Or was the noise lower? Or even both? 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 01.07.2012 15:00, schrieb [email protected]: Reception of July 1, 20; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-07/msg00614.html (9,357 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]