Stefan
Noise appeared to be lower by about 3 dB during the second session ... and
there always seems to be a couple dB QSB on SAQs signal strength over 5 -
10's of minutes. When the combination works out to be favorable I get
'decent' copy ... and light or nil copy when not. So really it is a
combination of both. One might expect to get better reception during the
winter test but that has not necessarily been my experience over many years.
Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stefan Schäfer" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2012 9:06 AM
Subject: Re: LF: SAQ reception in CT
Hi Jay,
Interesting. Were the signal levels higher in the afternoon? Or was the
noise lower? Or even both?
73, Stefan/DK7FC
Am 01.07.2012 15:00, schrieb [email protected]:
Reception of July 1, 2012 1200 UTC session was better than the 0900 UTC
although not as good as 'all time' best reception of SAQ during the 2nd
session of the July 2011 event.
MP3 from this morning's 2nd session pre message 'test and tune' at :
http://www.w1vd.com/SAQ070112.mp3 .
Setup: modified AMRAD e probe > audio LNA > Delta 44 sound card >
Spectrum Laboratory software
Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2
|
