Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: SAQ reception in CT

from [Stefan Schäfer] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: SAQ reception in CT
From: Stefan Schäfer <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2012 15:06:34 +0200
In-reply-to: <001401cd5789$8dce5c60$8d01a8c0@JAYDELL>
References: <001401cd5789$8dce5c60$8d01a8c0@JAYDELL>
Reply-to: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 
Hi Jay,
Interesting. Were the signal levels higher in the afternoon? Or was the noise lower? Or even both? 
73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 01.07.2012 15:00, schrieb jrusgrove@comcast.net:
Reception of July 1, 2012 1200 UTC session was better than the 0900 UTC although not as good as 'all time' best reception of SAQ during the 2nd session of the July 2011 event. 
MP3 from this morning's 2nd session pre message 'test and tune' at : 
http://www.w1vd.com/SAQ070112.mp3 .

Setup: modified AMRAD e probe > audio LNA > Delta 44 sound card > 
Spectrum Laboratory software


Jay W1VD  WD2XNS  WE2XGR/2

















[More with this subject...]










<Prev in Thread]
Current Thread
[Next in Thread>




















Previous by Date: 
LF: SAQ reception in CT, jrusgrove




Next by Date: 
Re: LF: SAQ reception in CT, jrusgrove




Previous by Thread: 
LF: SAQ reception in CT, jrusgrove




Next by Thread: 
Re: LF: SAQ reception in CT, jrusgrove




Indexes: 
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists]