To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: SAQ reception in CT |
From: | Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sun, 01 Jul 2012 15:06:34 +0200 |
In-reply-to: | <001401cd5789$8dce5c60$8d01a8c0@JAYDELL> |
References: | <001401cd5789$8dce5c60$8d01a8c0@JAYDELL> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
Hi Jay,Interesting. Were the signal levels higher in the afternoon? Or was the noise lower? Or even both? 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 01.07.2012 15:00, schrieb [email protected]: Reception of July 1, 2012 1200 UTC session was better than the 0900 UTC although not as good as 'all time' best reception of SAQ during the 2nd session of the July 2011 event.MP3 from this morning's 2nd session pre message 'test and tune' at : http://www.w1vd.com/SAQ070112.mp3 .Setup: modified AMRAD e probe > audio LNA > Delta 44 sound card > Spectrum Laboratory softwareJay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: SAQ reception in CT, jrusgrove |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: SAQ reception in CT, jrusgrove |
Previous by Thread: | LF: SAQ reception in CT, jrusgrove |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: SAQ reception in CT, jrusgrove |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |