Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Reflector\s+split\?\.\.\.please\s+No\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Reflector split?...please No. (score: 1)
Author: "'Geri' Kinzel, DK8KW" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 16:21:37 -0500
Alan, G3NYK wrote a lot of words I fully support, including Above all, and as with Amateur Radio in general, variety of interest is our strength, and should not divide us.< I vote against splitting t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00109.html (9,587 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Reflector split?...please No. (score: 1)
Author: "Marco Bruno IK1ODO" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 21:04:01 +0100 (added by [email protected])
Hi all, I agree with Alan, Alberto and others. Please, don't split the reflector! The knowlwdge and wisdom of the list is very great. Today an OM may be interested in the last issues about millihertz
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00112.html (9,487 bytes)

3. LF: Reflector split?...please No. (score: 1)
Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 19:36:45 +0100
Hi all, I have been considering this thorny topic for some time as it was obvious that it would be raised sooner or later. Personally I want to see all that is written about LF, but being aware of th
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00116.html (12,890 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu