Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+mini\-whip\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: Mini-Whip (score: 1)
Author: "Roelof Bakker" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:14:39 +0100
Dear James, Thank you for your comments. I did already as you suggested and increased the bias resistor to 10 M. The coupling/decoupling capacitors were increased to 1 uF and the RFC's to 8.2 mH. Thi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00299.html (12,885 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Re: Mini-Whip (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:31:10 +0000
Absolutely agree with Jim, those bias resisters are the worst possible value - maximum noise match! Must be at least 10 times that for the small antenna. Intermod can be a problem here too - very har
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00369.html (12,803 bytes)

3. LF: Re: Mini-Whip (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:51:29 +0100
Dear Roelof, LF Group, Thinking about your mini-whip design, it seems to me it might benefit from modification for VLF use. The circuit is a high Z buffer driven by the capacitive probe - the source
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00480.html (14,709 bytes)

4. LF: Re: mini-whip (score: 1)
Author: "PA0WFO" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:35:06 +0100
Hello Om Roelof , I,m also interested in your mini Whip . Pse be so kind to mail me the pdf . 73,William PA0WFO -- Original Message -- From: "Roelof Bakker" <[email protected]> To: <rsgb_lf_group@b
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00281.html (9,649 bytes)

5. LF: Re: Mini-Whip (score: 1)
Author: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 21:38:31 +0100
Unfortunately, it still has not appeared in print. This is the reason that the information is not available on a website yet. Then please send me also the PDF file describing your active E-field prob
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00298.html (9,192 bytes)

6. LF: RE: Mini-Whip (score: 1)
Author: Tom Gruis, EdD, KØHTF <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:55:10 -0600
Dear Roelof, Just in case mine was a request that was misdirected, here that request is again for the mini-whip file. Thank you and 73, Doc
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00302.html (9,052 bytes)

7. LF: Re: Mini-Whip (score: 1)
Author: "MIKE REID" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 20:28:35 -0600
Can someone email it to me? My request must have gotten lost in the pile last night. Thank you, Mike WE0H -- Original Message -- From: hajo.brandt.dj1zb To: mailto:[email protected] rsgb_l
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00305.html (11,770 bytes)

8. LF: Re: Mini-Whip (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:24:56 -0600
Hello Roelof, I'm just getting caught up on the last weeks mail and found your note. Would you please forward a copy to me. I'm interested in comparing it to the AMRAD antenna and I think I may still
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00355.html (10,048 bytes)

9. LF: Re: Mini-Whip (score: 1)
Author: "Theo Dukers" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 19:52:24 +0100
Hello Roelof, Could you send me a copy of your mini-whip antenna ? I work with the selective voltmeters Type SPM-12 for LF reception with narrow bandwiths as you do. For antennas I use both loop and
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00394.html (15,220 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu