Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+beacon\s+on\s+501\.59kc\/s\s+USB\s+RX\s+dial\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: beacon on 501.59kc/s USB RX dial (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 13:58:56 +0200
What is the actual tx qrg then? Just for exactly looking if the signal is visible at all. 73 Clemens DL4RAJ -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] M0FMT To: [email protected] rsgb
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00090.html (13,890 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Re: beacon on 501.59kc/s USB RX dial (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 13:12:35 +0100
could be 503.275 ? +/- a bit ! G. From: [email protected] Clemens Paul Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2012 12:58 PM To: [email protected] [email protected] Cc: [email protected]
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00190.html (15,014 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Re: beacon on 501.59kc/s USB RX dial (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 19:14:30 +0100
Graham states... ! As there is no locking to 'actual / time' delays may be introduced in the tx keying chain, But the delay must be symmetrical and not change the pulse width , whilst being of a cons
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00200.html (19,454 bytes)

4. LF: Re: beacon on 501.59kc/s USB RX dial (score: 1)
Author: "DENNIS EASTERLING" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 18:25:09 +0100
Hi Pete Been busy and did not read your emails until it was too late, but judging by reports it looks good, though pity about PC crash. It seems that you sorted out the opera keying, I wonder what wa
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00232.html (14,612 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Re: beacon on 501.59kc/s USB RX dial (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 17:19:03 +0100
Ok Pete, These are all the decodes I have , I was using the Skanti r5003 Rx with 40 ft alloy scaffold pole vertical , no atu , only the pre-selector in the rx , fed vis abt 90 feet of rg213 coax Good
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00260.html (24,067 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Re: beacon on 501.59kc/s USB RX dial (score: 1)
Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 14:15:28 +0100 (BST)
What is the actual tx qrg then? Just for exactly looking if the signal is visible at all. 73 Clemens DL4RAJ -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] M0FMT To: [email protected] rsgb
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00270.html (16,347 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Re: beacon on 501.59kc/s USB RX dial (score: 1)
Author: "DENNIS EASTERLING" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 18:42:49 +0100
Hi Pete Ha Ha! poetic justice as you say. I'm sorry, ha ha, that you had some unknown happening with your PC. have you found out why the PC crashed the other day. I also use opto isolators between ri
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00528.html (20,854 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Re: beacon on 501.59kc/s USB RX dial (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 18:11:48 +0200
Hi Pete, Maybe its worth to spend a common mode choke or an optocoupler between PA and PC? You may try just to key the TX with the PC via an optocoupler. Should be no problem with Opera, as Graham st
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00530.html (18,911 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Re: beacon on 501.59kc/s USB RX dial (score: 1)
Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 17:53:25 +0100 (BST)
Hi Pete Been busy and did not read your emails until it was too late, but judging by reports it looks good, though pity about PC crash. It seems that you sorted out the opera keying, I wonder what w
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00555.html (17,517 bytes)

10. Re: LF: Re: beacon on 501.59kc/s USB RX dial (score: 1)
Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 13:33:48 +0100 (BST)
could be 503.275 ? +/- a bit ! G. From: [email protected] Clemens Paul Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2012 12:58 PM To: [email protected] [email protected] Cc: rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00592.html (17,979 bytes)

11. Re: LF: Re: beacon on 501.59kc/s USB RX dial (score: 1)
Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 13:59:35 +0100 (BST)
Wow and that was just using the Op w/fall ! You could reduce to 2 watts and still decode ! Glad the system is working for you G.. From: [email protected] M0FMT Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2012 1:33 PM
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00603.html (21,548 bytes)

12. Re: LF: Re: beacon on 501.59kc/s USB RX dial (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 13:37:26 +0100
Wow and that was just using the Op w/fall ! You could reduce to 2 watts and still decode ! Glad the system is working for you G.. From: [email protected] M0FMT Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2012 1:33 PM T
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00666.html (18,676 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu