Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+WSPR\s+503\.5\s*$/: 36 ]

Total 36 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: WSPR 503.5 (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 18:29:22 +0100
Dear Andy, John, LF Group, Yes, Chas, G3DXZ suddenly appeared on the WSPR frequency in CW, so we QSYed a bit for a contact - I'll probably recover, given time! The WSPR beacon is back on again now. C
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00047.html (11,674 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Re: WSPR 503.5 (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:02:46 +0000
Hello Mike, LF This is precisely why I thought it might be instructive to report TX power! In the above example, of an inefficient antenna and 800W vs an efficient antenna and 100W for the same ERP,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00054.html (12,218 bytes)

3. RE: LF: Re: WSPR 503.5 (score: 1)
Author: "Gary - G4WGT" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 21:46:35 +0100
Graham, LF, I do agree that ERP is more meaningful & as Mal & Andy stated it is the criteria with which the licence is approved. My comment was to follow the WSPR recommended method as adopting ERP w
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00138.html (16,577 bytes)

4. LF: Re: WSPR 503.5 (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 19:46:24 +0100
Dear LF Group, The M0BMU WSPR beacon will be RX only while I go out to dinner - should be QRV again later tonight. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00150.html (11,686 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Re: WSPR 503.5 (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 17:52:57 +0100
Yes that funny mode is 559 up here using the mk1 lug 'an' speaker ! G .. Jim is 10 - 11dB SNR apart from the transmission at 1622 when there was a dropout of some kind in his signal Was about to say
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00177.html (11,114 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Re: WSPR 503.5 (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 20:32:28 +0100
Gary I got a decode at 192600 15 -11 0.5 -98 0 G4WGT 1083 27 I hope this helps mal/g3kev LF, Regarding my WSPR settings, the power is not a correct evaluation at the moment. My Tx power is about 5 wa
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00183.html (15,484 bytes)

7. RE: LF: Re: WSPR 503.5 (score: 1)
Author: "Gary - G4WGT" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 20:44:22 +0100
Mal, LF, Thanks for the report Mal. The best I can make of the ERP with the antenna current right at the bottom of the meter scale, antenna dimensions & the ERP spread sheet is 2 mW ERP. It has to be
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00192.html (17,130 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Re: WSPR 503.5 (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 22:21:19 +0000
Gary, congratulations - a Transatlantic crossing on 2mW ERP - your antenna must be correctly fabricated and elegantly designe - hi! Great result! John
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00202.html (11,647 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Re: WSPR 503.5 (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:36:16 +0100
This does not follow. On the HF bands the ERP is close to RF power, especially on the bands where WSPR is popular, and can therefore be used a a rough approximation. That is most certainly not the ca
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00208.html (11,102 bytes)

10. LF: Re: WSPR 503.5 (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:22:31 +0100
Dear Dave, LF Group, Many thanks to everyone who listened for the WSPR beacons and for all the reports. Over the last few weeks, 50 or so stations have copied the beacons, in about 14 different count
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00320.html (12,232 bytes)

11. LF: Re: WSPR 503.5 (score: 1)
Author: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 22:10:49 +0100
Log of the past few hours. Rx Perseus, antenna Roelof mini-whip Using Winrad->VAC->WSPR 1.01 090125 1800 4 -26 1.5 0.503500 M0BMU IO91 30 0 4464 0 090125 1808 3 -29 1.5 0.503470 G4JNT IO90 23 0 277 0
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00376.html (12,142 bytes)

12. Re: LF: Re: WSPR 503.5 (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 00:22:36 +0100
Jim If you want a laugh ,re stability - check out the posting of the spectrum plot on 4 mtrs when I was testing with Gary .. transverters are 'not' quite as stable as you would like .. but the wspr s
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00493.html (22,534 bytes)

13. Re: LF: Re: WSPR 503.5 (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 21:30:07 +0100
Gary, I don't think a guard band is really needed as if you set the centre carrier frequency to 503.9 , then operating at the extreme edges is not really possible, you're right on the edge of the wat
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00544.html (15,615 bytes)

14. Re: LF: Re: WSPR 503.5 (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:40:37 +0000
Jim is 10 - 11dB SNR apart from the transmission at 1622 when there was a dropout of some kind in his signal Was about to say there's QRM on Jims signal (at 1639z), but its that funny on-off mode, de
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00553.html (11,183 bytes)

15. RE: LF: Re: WSPR 503.5 (score: 1)
Author: "Gary - G4WGT" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 20:56:33 +0100
Hi John, LF, You wrote :- As to power reporting, I see that most people on LF/MF are attempting to estimate ERP, and use this figure in the beacon data. This aspect of power reporting method has been
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00643.html (12,818 bytes)

16. Re: LF: Re: WSPR 503.5 (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 17:40:27 +0000
Is there some sort of unofficial bandplan on this band? I'm rather late coming on to it having only got the NoV last week, and haven't followed the reflector over the last year or two (microwaves wer
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00712.html (12,905 bytes)

17. Re: LF: Re: WSPR 503.5 (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 21:20:56 +0100
In a MAN'S world its ERP that counts, it is more meaningful for LF/MF and it complies with the licence criteria. g3kev I disagree - ERP is the licenced figure, and its what really matters in the prop
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00754.html (13,421 bytes)

18. Re: LF: Re: WSPR 503.5 (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 22:22:48 +0100
Gary, Well that's a interesting point ,the data so far is that :- Operators with correctly fabricated engineering elegant antenna systems and modest power levels have in fact crossed the Atlantic wit
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00774.html (15,102 bytes)

19. LF: Re: WSPR 503.5 (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:51:32 +0100
Dear LF Group The M0BMU WSPR Beacon went QRT at about 1000utc - thanks for all the reports. Best DX of the night was of course from WD2XSH/17 at 5245km, according to my software - thanks, Dave. Also
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00813.html (10,353 bytes)

20. RE: LF: Re: WSPR 503.5 (score: 1)
Author: "Gary - G4WGT" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 20:12:07 +0100
Hi All, In agreement with John & Graham, I believe that makes sense. The top part of the band is probably the least used area so we just need to agree on a 200Hz slot of either 503.800 to 504.000KHz
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00850.html (13,766 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu