Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+USA\s+136kHz\s+proposals\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+USA\s+136kHz\s+proposals\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: USA 136kHz proposals (score: 1): Author: "Alberto di Bene" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 13:00:34 +0200; We need a plan for QRS as I suggested before and above and normal CW operations. These will be the most popular modes and have worked well so far. Other modes FSK/BPSK/JASON etc that take up more b/; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-05/msg00087.html (9,427 bytes)
2. LF: Re: USA 136kHz proposals (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 13:12:50 +0100; Dear Mal, LF Group, At 18:58 16/05/2002 +0100, you wrote: I think Jim you have missed the point about the band plan. In EU as you say we operate at the bottom end of the band 135.920 khz approx to av; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-05/msg00095.html (12,308 bytes)
3. LF: Re: USA 136kHz proposals (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 16:24:51 +0100; Dear Dave, LF Group At 11:28 16/05/2002 +0100, you wrote: I see from yesterday's ARRL Letter that the proposal for the USA 136 band is for 1W ERP and bandwidth less than 100Hz. I am puzzled why they; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-05/msg00108.html (11,020 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]