Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Top\s+loading\s+\-\s+to\s+short\s+or\s+not\s+to\s+short\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: Top loading - to short or not to short? (score: 1)
Author: "Laurence J Howell" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 08:15:29 -0800
To all respondents - Excellent. Guys, all responses looked good to me; When its stopped being windy I might try to "decouple the tower" method but in the mean time Ive changed to a single vertical st
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-05/msg00025.html (8,722 bytes)

2. LF: Re: Top loading - to short or not to short? (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 12:57:18 +0100
In looking at my LF Inverted L, and specifically the 3 wire top loading wires - I've a couple of questions... 1. I see a recommendation that the vertical part of the Inv L aerial wire(s) should be a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-05/msg00026.html (10,663 bytes)

3. LF: Re: Top loading - to short or not to short? (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Brown" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 21:16:46 +1200
I believe you will find the multiple vertical wire arrangements are generally for mechanical stability and don't have a lot to offer electrically. As amateur top loaded antennas are generally a lot s
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-05/msg00027.html (11,824 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu