Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+WSPR\s+\=\=\s+ON\s+AIR\s+TEST\s+NOW\s+1545\s+HRS\s+\=\s+503\s+KHz\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: Re: WSPR == ON AIR TEST NOW 1545 HRS = 503 KHz (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Talbot" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 21:43:09 +0000
Set the new freq just after you announced the QSY, and get the occasional demod at DF = +430Hz which is correct for 1700Hz sync. But S/N has fallen and is now in the region of -30dB S/N so oughtn't r
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-03/msg00013.html (23,221 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Re: Re: WSPR == ON AIR TEST NOW 1545 HRS = 503 KHz (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Talbot" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 22:12:18 +0000
No, nothing on JT65A. WSPR is still decoding OK even though nothing is visible on the SpecJT screen. I;'ve been getting quite a lot of demods showing sync 404Hz with a S/N -25dB, but can't see anythi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-03/msg00032.html (27,766 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Re: Re: WSPR == ON AIR TEST NOW 1545 HRS = 503 KHz (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Talbot" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 19:03:01 +0000
Hi Graham Yes, I've got the right sequence time and am running WSPR and WSJT 5.98 in parallel. Surprising the WSJT averaging won't extract a valid decode. Some of the sessions are being tagged as hav
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-03/msg00056.html (15,468 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Re: Re: WSPR == ON AIR TEST NOW 1545 HRS = 503 KHz (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Talbot" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 18:35:19 +0000
The jammer is there again, right in the middle of the announced frequency plan. -- Andy G4JNT www.scrbg.org/g4jnt
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-03/msg00151.html (12,403 bytes)

5. LF: Re: Re: WSPR == ON AIR TEST NOW 1545 HRS = 503 KHz (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 17:40:58 +0100
Gary Thanks for the print out looks like 7 db up on last night , I wonder if its 3 or 6 db for 50% power change , Im adding the jt65-a stream shortly and will have to reduce levels , you should see p
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-03/msg00166.html (13,094 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Re: Re: WSPR == ON AIR TEST NOW 1545 HRS = 503 KHz (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 23:00:40 +0100
Ok Andy, Did you have a better signal early on , or have you a higher local noise ... ? If signal better early in night , can re-run test over the weekend , the results of this one are of intrest to
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-03/msg00217.html (22,640 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Re: Re: WSPR == ON AIR TEST NOW 1545 HRS = 503 KHz (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Talbot" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 20:28:28 +0000
Very Interesting. In the WSJT user screen there are several sucessive -19dB S/N individual listings and, out of 70 sequences, it has selected 22 of them as being valid, but not one single correct dec
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-03/msg00240.html (19,388 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Re: Re: WSPR == ON AIR TEST NOW 1545 HRS = 503 KHz (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 20:12:33 +0100
Well , Its a experimental band and I'm conducting a experiment , The frequency 'plan' took into account , beacons on the lower part of the band and Gary G4WGT , planning a qrss transmission near the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-03/msg00254.html (13,715 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Re: Re: WSPR == ON AIR TEST NOW 1545 HRS = 503 KHz (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Talbot" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 18:17:26 +0000
1750 8 -17 -0.1 0.001487 G0NBD IO83 37 28.3 1752 6 -18 0.1 0.001487 G0NBD IO83 37 28.3 1754 5 -20 0.0 0.001487 G0NBD IO83 37 28.2 1756 3 -20 0.1 0.001487 G0NBD IO83 37 28.4 1758 8 -18 0.1 0.001487 G
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-03/msg00257.html (14,695 bytes)

10. Re: LF: Re: Re: WSPR == ON AIR TEST NOW 1545 HRS = 503 KHz (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 23:14:51 +0100
Andy Martin, has just emailed these (and others) to me for jt65 mode .. he has some miss printing on the wspr decode , not much G .. 20:10 6 -19 -1 +001 CQ G0NBD IO83 D=222 Km (137 miles) Az=310° 20:
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-03/msg00337.html (22,804 bytes)

11. Re: LF: Re: Re: WSPR == ON AIR TEST NOW 1545 HRS = 503 KHz (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 22:10:33 +0100
Ok Andy, Well its decoding off air ok at my qth , keying looks ok offair and at birmingham , im running 10 watts per tone (20 watts peak during dual tx) I have just made a qsy inside the passband , t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-03/msg00355.html (19,689 bytes)

12. Re: LF: Re: Re: WSPR == ON AIR TEST NOW 1545 HRS = 503 KHz (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 19:49:23 +0100
Ok Andy, Thanks for taking a look , the jt65 been running for a while now , did you have the 2 systems on when you decoded the wspr signals ? jt56 is sending at even mins , check the birmingham grabb
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-03/msg00365.html (15,327 bytes)

13. Re: LF: Re: Re: WSPR == ON AIR TEST NOW 1545 HRS = 503 KHz (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 20:29:18 +0100
Ok Andy, Looks like making headway .... I'm using multipsk (the test version) which has jt65-modes .. and for want of a better way of describing the frequency ..sorry if it sounds a 'cb' like ... but
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-03/msg00504.html (16,874 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu