Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: Re: WSPR == ON AIR TEST NOW 1545 HRS = 503 KHz

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: WSPR == ON AIR TEST NOW 1545 HRS = 503 KHz
From: "Andy Talbot" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 19:03:01 +0000
In-reply-to: <00c401c88c4d$54318100$0d00000a@AGB>
References: <000f01c88a93$d7067790$0d00000a@AGB> <[email protected]> <002401c88aae$41827370$0d00000a@AGB> <001c01c88b58$657d1be0$0d00000a@AGB> <001101c88b6d$40ae25b0$0d00000a@AGB> <008601c88c34$1c6d43d0$0d00000a@AGB> <000d01c88c35$f0efecb0$6401a8c0@wgt01> <009e01c88c3b$6436ef20$0d00000a@AGB> <[email protected]> <00c401c88c4d$54318100$0d00000a@AGB>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Hi Graham
Yes, I've got the right sequence time and am running WSPR and WSJT
5.98 in parallel.  Surprising the WSJT averaging won't extract a valid
decode.   Some of the sessions are being tagged as having the sync
detected, with a resulting 2.5kHz S/N in the --25dB ballpark, but they
don't want to seem to be pulled together by the averaging.  The DF
figure is coming up as -285Hz, suggesting you're 15Hz lower than
advertised (should be -270Hz)

Do have very bad QRM here.  I've just gone over to th the old 137kHz
antenna minus its loading coil rather than the HF vertical that was
the existing 500kHz Rx.  The LF Tee is further from the house and
there is about 10dB less localised E field noise.  Its a pity about
the deliberate jamming taking place just above the upper tone
frequency.  I'm not sure how well JT65 can cope with that.

Update on the WSPR decodes below - it really does seem a very good
weak signal mode.   I'm just about to write June's Data Column for
radcom.   I'll give WSPR a section having now played with it for a
while in real hard off-air conditions

Andy  G4JNT

c:\WSPR>wspr Rx 0
1750   8 -17  -0.1   0.001487  G0NBD IO83 37             28.3
1752   6 -18   0.1   0.001487  G0NBD IO83 37             28.3
1754   5 -20   0.0   0.001487  G0NBD IO83 37             28.2
1756   3 -20   0.1   0.001487  G0NBD IO83 37             28.4
1758   8 -18   0.1   0.001487  G0NBD IO83 37             28.9
1800   8 -14  -0.3   0.001487  G0NBD IO83 37             30.1
1802   1 -24   0.0   0.001487                            28.7
1804   4 -20  -0.2   0.001487                            27.5
1814   3 -22  -0.2   0.001487                            28.1
1816   1 -23  -0.6   0.001487                            27.9
1818   4 -24   0.0   0.001487                            27.8
1820   7 -19  -0.4   0.001487  G0NBD IO83 37             27.4
1822   3 -24  -0.1   0.001487                            27.6
1828   2 -24  -0.3   0.001487                            20.1
1830   5 -23  -0.2   0.001487  G0NBD IO83 37             27.2
1832   4 -20  -0.1   0.001487  G0NBD IO83 37             24.6
1834   4 -24  -0.3   0.001487  G0NBD IO83 37             21.9
1836   5 -23  -0.2   0.001487  G0NBD IO83 37             22.8
1842   2 -24  -0.3   0.001487  G0NBD IO83 37             23.2
1844   1 -26  -0.3   0.001487                            22.3
1848   7 -19  -0.2   0.001487  G0NBD IO83 37             21.9
1850   2 -24   0.0   0.001487                            24.0
1852   7 -19  -0.1   0.001487  G0NBD IO83 37             27.3
1854   5 -19  -0.1   0.001487  G0NBD IO83 37             23.5
1856   3 -19  -0.1   0.001487  G0NBD IO83 37             24.9






On 22/03/2008, Graham <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ok Andy,
>
> Thanks for taking a look , the jt65 been running for a while now , did you
> have
>  the 2 systems on when you decoded the wspr signals ?
>
> jt56 is sending at even mins , check the birmingham grabber , should show
> the 2 tone sets
>
> Tnx
>
> Graham ,
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andy Talbot" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2008 6:17 PM
> Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: WSPR == ON AIR TEST NOW 1545 HRS = 503 KHz
>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>