Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+RE\:\s+GAIN\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+RE\:\s+GAIN\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: RE: Re: Re: RE: GAIN (score: 1): Author: "Ashlock,William" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 21:59:38 -0500; Mal, Heck Bill even made a loop that was 25 feet by 25 feet and it still made it several hundred miles on less than a watt. This loop has a Q of ~400 (3/4" ID Cu pipe). Rac = ~.08 ohms so the current; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-04/msg00290.html (8,478 bytes)
2. LF: Re: Re: Re: RE: GAIN (score: 1): Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 13:33:32 +0100; about they The difference is in the coupling method. The "series" version uses a step-down transformer between the transmission line and the loop, with the low-impedance secondary wired in series wi; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-04/msg00302.html (9,761 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]