Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+RE\:\s+Re\:\s+TA\s+APR\s+28\/29\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+RE\:\s+Re\:\s+TA\s+APR\s+28\/29\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: RE: Re: TA APR 28/29 (score: 1): Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 10:29:17 -0400; Dave, Your setup sounds fine, and the 0.020 Hz reading is close enough for any practical purpose. And you won't draw me into an argument about QSO's over multiple days! I should really have copied yo; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-04/msg00377.html (10,277 bytes)
2. LF: Re: RE: Re: TA APR 28/29 (score: 1): Author: "Jay Rusgrove" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 11:19:29 -0400; Dave Are you planning on transmitting wolf again tonight? Jay -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] Dave Pick To: [email protected] [email protected] Sent: Friday; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-04/msg00379.html (15,230 bytes)
3. LF: Re: RE: Re: TA APR 28/29 (score: 1): Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 10:51:42 +0100; Thanks John. I've received you and you've received me.. We can claim a QSO! ;-) (sorry Mal) The only authenctic QSO's on LF are those conducted in real time CW and possibly some at QRS2 or 3. The ma; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-04/msg00396.html (15,162 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]