Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+QRG\s+of\s+SAQ\s+transmission\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+QRG\s+of\s+SAQ\s+transmission\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: QRG of SAQ transmission (score: 1): Author: "Alberto di Bene" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 18:07:53 +0200; [...] The frequency wobbles around slightly - it was about 17.220kHz +/-5Hz. Good ! This is in complete accord with what was captured by my friend. Now I can phone him to reassure him that he receiv; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-09/msg00142.html (8,224 bytes)
2. LF: Re: QRG of SAQ transmission (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 16:35:01 +0000; Dear Alberto, LF Group, I recorded a .wav file of the SAQ broadcast yesterday. I checked the frequency using Spec Lab, and the calibration factors I use for Wolf reception. The frequency wobbles arou; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-09/msg00143.html (8,740 bytes)
3. LF: Re: QRG of SAQ transmission (score: 1): Author: "Alberto di Bene" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 15:31:24 +0200; As a further comment to my previous messages, I forgot to say that those SAQ reception captures were sent by I5IAR Umberto, who had simply connected a tuned length of wire to the line input of the so; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-09/msg00146.html (8,287 bytes)
4. LF: Re: QRG of SAQ transmission (score: 1): Author: "Alberto di Bene" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 14:34:09 +0200; john sexton wrote: I too noticed the frequency was not spot on and it increased a little at start-up, but this is perhaps not surprising when you bear in mind the means of generation and its age. In; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-09/msg00147.html (8,761 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]