Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+OT\s+Waffle\s+or\s+Spam\s+\?\s+A\s+different\s+look\s+at\s+ZEVS\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: OT Waffle or Spam ? A different look at ZEVS (score: 1)
Author: qrss <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:00:14 +0100
Hi Chris I was only joking, heaven knows we don't want to start debating it, or feed the Mal. Anyway an interesting view point all parts of which are easily countered. Force fed - there are groups fo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-06/msg00139.html (11,152 bytes)

2. LF: Re: OT Waffle or Spam ? A different look at ZEVS (score: 1)
Author: "Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:18:37 +0100
I don't think so, we're rather being force fed. Not even sure it's legal to receive this signal under the terms of the various Wireless Telegraphy Acts, as it carries information and is not intended
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-06/msg00145.html (11,216 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Re: OT Waffle or Spam ? A different look at ZEVS (score: 1)
Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:46:35 +0100
Personally I can't see any harm with the ZEVS postings here. Keep them coming - it takes 2 seconds to delete them if not of interest, or zero seconds if you make a filter to bin emails with the word
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-06/msg00280.html (13,800 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Re: OT Waffle or Spam ? A different look at ZEVS (score: 1)
Author: Gary - G4WGT <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:41:27 +0100
Hi Chris, Eddie & All, I have also given this/these subjects some thought & I have been seriously tempted to make a similar statement as Chris has just posted. As interesting they may be for the foll
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-06/msg00335.html (12,608 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu