Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Morse\s+tones\s+\/\s+filters\s+etc\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: Morse tones / filters etc. (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Ravenhill" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 09:01:42 +0100
a visitor told me the "sweet spot" was probably were the two ears were copying best was were there was a phase shift in the audio approaching 90 degrees thus giving what we now know is the extra sens
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00322.html (10,029 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Re: Morse tones / filters etc. (score: 1)
Author: "vernall" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 21:36:28 +1200
phase I have also experienced noticeably easier copy of weak CW in noise when at a distance from the headphones - in fact I find that turning up the AF gain a bit and leaving the headphones on a tabl
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00324.html (10,372 bytes)

3. LF: Re: Morse tones / filters etc. (score: 1)
Author: "Des Kostryca" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 19:30:45 -0700
Has anyone experimented with phase shifted / delayed audio, i.e. with "raw" audio fed to one half of the headphones and a (variably) phase-shifted / delayed version fed to the other half? Kevin G1HD
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00344.html (9,592 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu