Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+LF\s+RX\s+loop\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. LF: RE: LF RX loop (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:09:42 +0200
Hi Stefan, based on 470nF and 137kHz the inductance is only 0.47uH (what means XL = 0.4 Ohm). As Q = XL/R for a Q = 8 the loss resistance is 0.05 Ohm. This seems acceptable to me. Due to the very low
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-06/msg00004.html (13,048 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Re: LF RX loop (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 02:51:41 +0200
Jim, Alan, Scott, Daniele, Thanks for your comments and suggestions! I will build the preamp and try to get a higher Q. I have some WIMA FKP-1 caps, 2 kV type in that C range and will buy a bigger co
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-06/msg00076.html (15,992 bytes)

3. LF: Re: LF RX loop (score: 1)
Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:51:13 +0100
Hi Stefan a few points from a quick read your message ......... 1st The null depth......I think there could be two reasons why it isnt deeper. One is that the vertical dimenion of the loop could act
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-06/msg00117.html (14,974 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Re: LF RX loop (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:42:20 +0200
Hello Clemens, I measured the Q by coupling to a smaller loop that was connected to my DDS VFO. First i found the resonance frequency, then i in- and decreased the frequency until û was 0.707x u max,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-06/msg00156.html (14,140 bytes)

5. LF: Re: LF RX loop (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:39:32 +0100
Dear Stefan, LF Group, I did some experiments on single-turn loop Q when designing the "bandpass loops" (BPloops2.pdf at https://sites.google.com/site/uk500khz/members-files/files ). With a 1m x 1m s
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-06/msg00171.html (15,893 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Re: LF RX loop (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 07:48:47 +0200
Well done Stefan,this loaded Q vaue looks very reasonable. 73 Clemens DL4RAJ -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] Stefan Schäfer To: [email protected] rsgb_lf
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-06/msg00186.html (11,591 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Re: LF RX loop (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 08:37:06 +0200
Hi Stefan, ok,then you've measured the *loaded* antenna Q because the 50 Ohm source of your VFO is included in the circuit. The Q of a LCR circuit is defined Q=f0/B. That formula was derived with a s
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-06/msg00220.html (15,198 bytes)

8. LF: Re: LF RX loop (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:15:32 +0200
Stefan, just to be sure how you have measured Q. If you are feeding the loop with a 50 Ohm source and want to measure the unloaded Q of the loop as per the formula Q = f0/B you would have to look whe
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-06/msg00242.html (12,806 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Re: LF RX loop (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:06:40 +0200
Hello Peter, Tnx for confirmation. Today i bought a new copper tube, circular, 1m diameter and 18mm tube diameter and 1mm thickness (16 EUR). This time i realized excellent contact of the caps dieect
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-06/msg00254.html (12,256 bytes)

10. Re: LF: Re: LF RX loop (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 15:46:03 +0200
Hello Peter, Clemens, Jim, LF, Before a few days i have bought a new copper tube with 18mm diameter and 1mm thickness. I formed a loop with 1m diameter. This time i put 2 copper plates into the tube
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-06/msg00349.html (13,340 bytes)

11. LF: Re: LF RX loop (score: 1)
Author: pws <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:47:23 +0200
Hi Stefan, Confirming your findings. In the late 90th I built a 2m-loop from 1" coax ("Flexwell") for nulling out Loran-C splatter. I remember a bandwidth of ~12-15 kHz => Q ~= 10 with 8.2uH/165nF. h
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-06/msg00382.html (10,792 bytes)

12. Re: LF: Re: LF RX loop (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 21:18:49 +0200
Dear Jim, LF, Thanks for the calculations and explanations. By now my loop has a unloaded Q of 230. It is still a prototype and i expect the final Q will be 250. I took the loop to my trip to Hamburg
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-07/msg00127.html (12,440 bytes)

13. LF: Re: LF RX loop (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2011 14:50:24 +0100
Dear Stefan, LF Group, A bit late, but better than nothing... One more question: Does it make sense (regarding good SNR) to further try to improve the Q or does it just make frequency adjustment comp
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-07/msg00197.html (11,742 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu