Roger QRP on 10 es 6 m works well because of antenna dimentions and ERP but is a different ball game on LF where high power is needed to generate a sensible ERP to get beyond the back yard. Activity
Mal, LF, Am 22.05.2011 14:43, schrieb mal hamilton: Stefan es Co The procedure in the past was to use CW anywhere on the 137 khz band and then Tune the band after a CQ for a reply, this is what I do
Gerhard You have done well on VLF. Why have operators from 29 countries gone QRT this past few years if LF is so progressive and wonderful. I am not the only one that thinks LF is a waste of time !!!
Mal It must have been fun when CW activity on 136/500kHz was high. However, lack of CW activity does not mean lack of activity per se. Most nights (and some days) I see QRSS or WSPR activity on thes
Stefan es Co The procedure in the past was to use CW anywhere on the 137 khz band and then Tune the band after a CQ for a reply, this is what I do because everybody has their antenna resonated on a d
Stefan I am considering going QRT on LF. You cannot hear me on CW with 1w erp nor can you hear PA0A with 800 watts/1w erp, I can hear you and others but the majority are on Beacon mode qsl via email,
Mal! In the end it's up to you....weather you quit activity on LF or not. Though I like some of your controversial opinions, I also do not agree with all of them....this is what a discussion is about
