Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+IC706\s+vs\s+TS850\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: IC706 vs TS850 (score: 1)
Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 20:18:18 +0100
Hi Mike one of the top sites for mods is www.mods.dk Cheers de Alan G3NYK
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-06/msg00207.html (10,759 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Re: IC706 vs TS850 (score: 1)
Author: "captbrian" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 19:11:21 +0100
Thanks all. I have written off for a MRF pre-amp. It seems cheaper than blowing up the BC station - for the time being anyway...
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-06/msg00208.html (10,096 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Re: IC706 vs TS850 (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 18:24:05 +0100
Yes, quite right. I managed to find the 1Hz steps but you need a steady hand as the TS-850 dial on 'Fine' is 1kHz/rev (ie 1Hz steps are about 0.3 degrees of turn!). For info, the IC-706 has 200Hz/rev
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-06/msg00209.html (10,330 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Re: IC706 vs TS850 (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 14:55:17 +0100
I used an MRF/YXM pre-amp (build from circuits on the web, or buy from G0MRF) with my IC706 with great success. The tuned circuits in the front end are very sharp with excellent out of band rejection
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-06/msg00210.html (9,693 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Re: IC706 vs TS850 (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 15:39:27 +0200
Bryan, if only (the lack of) selectivity is a problem and not sensitivity I would recommend to insert a (passive) bandpassfilter in front of the RX. QRM/QRN level at 136 kHz is that high that even a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-06/msg00211.html (9,867 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Re: IC706 vs TS850 (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 08:40:31 EDT
In a message dated 09/06/2006 12:35:12 GMT Standard Time, [email protected] writes: Thanks for that. It certainly helps _me_. I have a 706/2/g but no 850. The front end of my 706 is so wide it
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-06/msg00212.html (8,942 bytes)

7. LF: Re: IC706 vs TS850 (score: 1)
Author: "captbrian" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 13:33:27 +0100
Thanks for that. It certainly helps _me_. I have a 706/2/g but no 850. The front end of my 706 is so wide it recieves all the world at the same time ! but I am only one mile from a MW broadcast stati
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-06/msg00213.html (11,633 bytes)

8. LF: Re: IC706 vs TS850 (score: 1)
Author: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 12:27:05 +0200
I'm fairly sure that the TS850 tunes in 1Hz steps even though it only displays to 10Hz. If you want to reduce the tuning rate, you can get a tuning upgrader module which will reduce the tuning rate t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-06/msg00214.html (10,270 bytes)

9. LF: Re: IC706 vs TS850 (score: 1)
Author: "Tracey Gardner" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 10:55:59 +0100
Hello Mike I'm fairly sure that the TS850 tunes in 1Hz steps even though it only displays to 10Hz. If you want to reduce the tuning rate, you can get a tuning upgrader module which will reduce the tu
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-06/msg00215.html (9,763 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu