Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: IC706 vs TS850

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: IC706 vs TS850
From: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 15:39:27 +0200
Delivered-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Bryan,

if only (the lack of) selectivity is a problem and not sensitivity I would recommend to insert a (passive) bandpassfilter in front of the RX.
QRM/QRN level at 136 kHz is that high that even a few dB insertion loss won't do any harm.
With my Kenwood TS440 and a tuned inverted-L antenna (12m high, 22m long) I could insert  a 30 dB attenuator and the band noise was still a lot stronger than the RX noise.

73, Rik  ON7YD / OR7T

At 08:40 9/06/2006 -0400, you wrote:
In a message dated 09/06/2006 12:35:12 GMT Standard Time, [email protected] writes:
Thanks for that.  It certainly helps _me_.   I have a 706/2/g but no 850.

The front end of my 706 is so wide it recieves all the world at the same
time !  but I am only one mile from a MW broadcast station .

  I can see I need at least a V.  narrow tuned pre-amp.  Any ideas where to
find one? [ Newbury Rally next week ]
 
Hi.
 
The G3YXM / G0MRF pre-amp is fairly narrow. It certainly offers good rejection of MW.
But it is 50 ohms ish in and out.  - I think some simple response tests are listed on the web site.
 
Another possibility would be a tuned input FET which could be made a higher Z input.
 
73
 
David  G0MRF
 
www.g0mrf.freeserve.co.uk


Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm for more information.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>