I don't think that bandwidth indepency is of much importance, we just have to agree on what bandwith is used. Or eventually Jason could have USB/LSB switch. Oops, typing too fast : read sideband inst
So, what would all you judge more important, sideband independence, or bandwidth used ? Your vote will decide the final format for Jason. Hello Alberto, As bandwidth is important for : 1. reducing QR
Hi Alberto and group, Many thanks for the adjustable center frequency, especially for TX ! I think it's important to use a quite high audio frequency, so that all harmonics of the AF signal are outsi
you would need 17 tones - then in the example it would be 13+16 mod 17 = 12; perhaps this is something like what Stuart is suggesting? Dear Jim and the group, exactly, with 17 tones, taking into acc
Dear Alberto, LF Group At 14:30 16/01/2002 +0100, you wrote: So, what would all you judge more important, sideband independence, or bandwidth used ? Your vote will decide the final format for Jason.
... if the system would be depending on the sideband, could it be internally switched from "normal" to "reverse" (I mean at a later version, not the test version of course)? In this case I believe i
Alberto, So, what would all you judge more important, sideband independence, or bandwidth used ? Your vote will decide the final format for Jason. ... if the system would be depending on the sideband
If the centre frequency is F, and the spacing between tones is f, the possible tone frequencies are F +/- (n-0.5)*f where n is an integer from 1...16. Therefore there are 32 possible equally-spaced
