Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Fwd\:\s+Help\s+needed\,\s+mechanical\s+filters\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: RE: Fwd: Help needed, mechanical filters (score: 1)
Author: DK1IS <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 11:23:13 +0200
Am 29.06.2012 23:54, schrieb Stefan Schäfer: MF, It becomes better! I just realised that this filter is perfect to protect a receiver like the IC706 when using a BIG antenna as the MF receive antenna
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00055.html (12,225 bytes)

2. Re: LF: RE: Fwd: Help needed, mechanical filters (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 22:23:19 +0100
Yes an exciting game of 'Techno-Guess' HiHi What is the stated pass band ripple ? Is that plot 3 dB / 50% or 6 dB ? Should there be a standing mA feed ? which may dampen the device a bit , stop it wr
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00114.html (15,794 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Re: Fwd: Help needed, mechanical filters (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 01:29:55 +0200
Hi Alan, Mike, Claudio, Thanks for the help! Am 30.06.2012 00:08, schrieb Alan Melia: Stefan if they are really that old then they mar be deterioration of the elements. Seems not to apply for the one
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00229.html (17,360 bytes)

4. LF: Re: Fwd: Help needed, mechanical filters (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 11:51:43 +0200
Hi Stefan, That's the reason why I opted for for the yahoo list... But back on topic.:-) If I understand you correctly you did not terminate the filter output side while measuring with the hi Z probe
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00253.html (14,873 bytes)

5. Re: LF: RE: Fwd: Help needed, mechanical filters (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 14:28:37 +0200
Hi Tom. Thanks. Yes, i have the 2 V rms in mind. It was stated in the datasheet. I intend to use a series configuration of 3 antiparallel 1N4148 diodes on the input to protect the filter. At 50 Ohm,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00310.html (12,834 bytes)

6. Re: LF: RE: Fwd: Help needed, mechanical filters (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 23:54:15 +0200
MF, It becomes better! I just realised that this filter is perfect to protect a receiver like the IC706 when using a BIG antenna as the MF receive antenna. It will be easy to build a passive circuit
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00331.html (16,397 bytes)

7. LF: Re: Fwd: Help needed, mechanical filters (score: 1)
Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 23:08:08 +0100
Stefan if they are really that old then they mar be deterioration of the elements. I remember the Kokusai fikters used in KW TX and RX designs (much bigger profile) degraded over the years. I have a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00342.html (16,095 bytes)

8. LF: RE: Fwd: Help needed, mechanical filters (score: 1)
Author: "Mike" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 22:03:51 +0100
Stefan Have you included the 300pF capacitor (I do not read German) and not sure if it is the same on both ends? I would expect the launch circuit needs a cap both ends. Mike G3JVL --Original Message
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00516.html (14,317 bytes)

9. Re: LF: RE: Fwd: Help needed, mechanical filters (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 22:26:02 +0100
Ringing , that should be ..... miss 2 throws of the dice : ( From: [email protected] Graham Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 10:23 PM To: [email protected] [email protected] Su
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00535.html (16,745 bytes)

10. LF: RE: Fwd: Help needed, mechanical filters (score: 1)
Author: "Mike" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 21:56:02 +0100
Hi Stefan The source or load impedances are wrong. Try the test with a pot in series on one end first and see what value resistance reduces the ripple. Best if a spec can be found then design circuit
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00763.html (14,390 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu