Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Frequency\s+standards\s+for\s+LF\.\s+The\s+next\s+generation\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Frequency\s+standards\s+for\s+LF\.\s+The\s+next\s+generation\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: Frequency standards for LF. The next generation (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 16:30:45 +0000; Dear Andy, LF Group, Thanks for writing about this very interesting project - At 15:17 28/01/2002 +0000, you wrote: The effect is to keep the VCXO precisely locked in the long term to the GPS signal,; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00011.html (9,041 bytes)
2. LF: Re: Frequency standards for LF. The next generation (score: 1): Author: "Alberto di Bene" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 18:44:10 +0100; Maybe I am missing something here, (and I am certainly not trying to detract from an excellent piece of work) but couldn't you also take the one second markers from MSF using an AM receiver, and dri; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00046.html (9,365 bytes)
3. LF: Re: Frequency standards for LF. The next generation (score: 1): Author: "Alberto di Bene" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 13:06:35 +0100; a I could also make use of a copy of the circuit, thanks for the offer Andy. 73 Alberto I2PHD; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-02/msg00282.html (8,773 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]