Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: Frequency standards for LF. The next generation

To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: Re: Frequency standards for LF. The next generation
From: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 16:30:45 +0000
In-reply-to: <[email protected] v.uk>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: <[email protected]>
Dear Andy, LF Group,

Thanks for writing about this very interesting project -

At 15:17 28/01/2002 +0000, you wrote:
The effect is to keep the VCXO precisely locked in the long term to the GPS
signal, although in the short term it's instantaneous phase is jittering,
and therefore the frequency is shifting by a Hz or two every second.  By
apropriate choice of charge pump R/C values, the jitter can be minimised.
When this source is subsequently divided down to LF, the phase shift is
reduced by the division factor.


What is the source of the jitter here - is it being introduced by the stabilisation circuit, or that due to the VCXO itself? Also, I can see that it would not matter much for long symbol lengths like Jason or you coherent PSK system, but would the jitter be a problem for something like WOLF, with it's 10 bits/s?

Cheers, Jim Moritz
73 de M0BMU



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • LF: Re: Frequency standards for LF. The next generation, James Moritz <=