Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Best\s+receiving\s+antenna\s+wanted\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Best\s+receiving\s+antenna\s+wanted\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. RE: LF: RE: Best receiving antenna wanted (score: 1): Author: "James Cowburn" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:04:35 +0100; When mine’s not on 500 it is watching 5649/5616/5598 Shanwick Aeradio and the Gander Freqs on 8.8xx and is a lot better than my dipole I also use for these. The noise level creeps up in the eve; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-10/msg00110.html (17,088 bytes)
2. Re: LF: RE: Best receiving antenna wanted (score: 1): Author: Gary - G4WGT <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:38:02 +0100; Hi Horst, Jim, LF, Same here, I have used a PA0RDT Mini-Whip active antenna for a good while now & it's performance is very good right down to 10kHz, may even go lower if I knew what to look for !!!; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-10/msg00410.html (12,325 bytes)
3. LF: RE: Best receiving antenna wanted (score: 1): Author: "James Cowburn" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:39:26 +0100; Hi Horst I've just installed one of Roelof Bakker's (PA0RDT) active mini whips and it is excellent at my QTH. Just my view, others may have different experiences With best regards Jim Dr. James Cowbu; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-10/msg00575.html (10,022 bytes)
4. Re: LF: RE: Best receiving antenna wanted (score: 1): Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:52:36 +0100; My online grabbers use the Mini-Whip antenna. 73, Gary - G4WGT. 2009/10/21 James Cowburn <[email protected]> Hi Horst I've just installed one of Roelof Bakker's (PA0RDT) active mini whips and; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-10/msg00651.html (13,548 bytes)
5. LF: Re: Best receiving antenna wanted (score: 1): Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:19:22 +0100; Hi Horst, Mmmmm your problem may not be the antenna it may be your use of the level measuring set !! A "good" receiver would work well at LF off that kind of aerial. You must remember that these LMSs; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-10/msg00691.html (11,326 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]