Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+7fsk\s+g4jnt\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+7fsk\s+g4jnt\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: 7fsk g4jnt (score: 1): Author: "jannsen" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 19:05:12 +0100; Andrew Talbot schrieb: Interesting that both pictures of the received signal were decoded using lower sideband, and many others on this reflector in the past have used LSB for their plots . Is that a; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-12/msg00152.html (8,506 bytes)
2. LF: Re: 7fsk g4jnt (score: 1): Author: "Andrew Talbot" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 12:57:42 +0100; Tnx for reports on this test signal, it does seem to penetrate. Interesting that both pictures of the received signal were decoded using lower sideband, and many others on this reflector in the past; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-12/msg00165.html (8,717 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Re: 7fsk g4jnt (score: 1): Author: "Nick" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2002 21:13:46 +0000; I know the reason for adopting LSB on the 1.8 / 3.5 / 7Mhz bands was to avoid clashing with shared users of the bands but..... Historical note, I think you will find that upper sideband above 9MHz a; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00558.html (8,352 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]