Re: LF: Re: 7fsk g4jnt

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: Re: 7fsk g4jnt
From:	"jannsen" <[email protected]>
Date:	Mon, 24 Dec 2001 19:05:12 +0100
References:	<000d01c18ba8$952b6420$969c01d4@g4jnt>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	<[email protected]>

Andrew Talbot schrieb:

Interesting that both pictures of the received signal were decoded using lower
sideband, and many others on this reflector in the past have used LSB for
their plots .  Is that a characteristic of am. activity on this band then ?
It seems rather unnatural to me wanting to deliberately invert the frequency
plan !    I know the reason for adopting LSB on the 1.8 / 3.5 / 7Mhz bands was
to avoid clashing with shared users of the bands but.....


Hi Andy,

I do use LSB because of the big QRM-maker DCF39 (138,38kHz). tks to theconstructors I can switch to the LSB in mode CW too.

regards
Uwe/dj8wx

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: Re: 7fsk g4jnt, Andrew Talbot Re: LF: Re: 7fsk g4jnt, jannsen <=

Previous by Date:	LF: 136, john currie
Next by Date:	LF: Season Greetings, boffin1
Previous by Thread:	LF: Re: 7fsk g4jnt, Andrew Talbot
Next by Thread:	LF: 7fsk g4jnt, Ko Versteeg
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]